HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2009, 01:19 AM   #1
JRyan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Several years ago, I attempted to get the Pontiac GTP's into the Classification Manual. Ironically, even though Pontiac was the "Car of NHRA", they didn't have any of the 1997 & up Grand Prixs listed in the Manual. Len Imbragno tried for several years, and even made extra classes for the FWD cars. But they weren't classified until after he left.

The reason I mention all that is, at the time, I asked about changing the pulley diameter. I was told that only the STOCK pulley diameter would be allowed. Rules for Supercharged Stockers aren't addressed in the rulebook, but back in the old '57 Ford days they had to use the STOCK pulleys. Hardly anything else has changed in Stock since then, so I was just wonderin'.

Jerry
JRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:00 AM   #2
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

>>>" Hardly anything else has changed in Stock since then, so I was just wonderin'.<<<

Jerry... you're a funny man.... lol!




Bill
__________________
Bill
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 11:32 AM   #3
BlueOval Ralph
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

One must remeber in the day (1957) Ford had 2 sets of pulleys one set for Stick and one for set for auto.

see
http://www.vs57.com/


Quote:
Originally Posted by JRyan View Post
Several years ago, I attempted to get the Pontiac GTP's into the Classification Manual. Ironically, even though Pontiac was the "Car of NHRA", they didn't have any of the 1997 & up Grand Prixs listed in the Manual. Len Imbragno tried for several years, and even made extra classes for the FWD cars. But they weren't classified until after he left.

The reason I mention all that is, at the time, I asked about changing the pulley diameter. I was told that only the STOCK pulley diameter would be allowed. Rules for Supercharged Stockers aren't addressed in the rulebook, but back in the old '57 Ford days they had to use the STOCK pulleys. Hardly anything else has changed in Stock since then, so I was just wonderin'.

Jerry
BlueOval Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 02:13 PM   #4
Jim Wahl
Veteran Member
 
Jim Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,845
Likes: 672
Liked 683 Times in 129 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jim Wahl Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Wahl
Exclamation Re: Mustang MPH?

I have been told that the stock OEM pulley with the correct tooth count and part number must be used on the new Ford. As far as the turbos, I have been though many tear downs and can tell you NHRA has all the specs they need to check the housings and cartridges. They check both wheel diameters and for clipping. The turbo must be completely stock as produced with the correct make and part number. Jim
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess)
2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion
2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion
1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up
Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association.
Jim Wahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 03:15 PM   #5
big blue galaxie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

What's funny about these boosted cars, and I know we are beating this issue again into the ground, is that as you keep loading these vehicles down weight wise they will get faster. The CJ's, no matter how they get weighed down, if the chassis is set up right they will not slow down. Break parts, yes, slow down, no.
big blue galaxie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 03:53 PM   #6
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Quote:
Originally Posted by big blue galaxie View Post
What's funny about these boosted cars, and I know we are beating this issue again into the ground, is that as you keep loading these vehicles down weight wise they will get faster. The CJ's, no matter how they get weighed down, if the chassis is set up right they will not slow down. Break parts, yes, slow down, no.
Now they can defy the laws of physics too? Please explain.
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 03:56 PM   #7
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Wahl View Post
I have been told that the stock OEM pulley with the correct tooth count and part number must be used on the new Ford. As far as the turbos, I have been though many tear downs and can tell you NHRA has all the specs they need to check the housings and cartridges. They check both wheel diameters and for clipping. The turbo must be completely stock as produced with the correct make and part number. Jim
Thanks for clarifying. I was pretty sure that the forced induction combinations didn't have a "blank check".
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 04:02 PM   #8
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

It looks like the "blank check" has already been cashed. The current AA/SA record holder has never posted a 109.80 mph figure in the 1/8 mile. And this is only the second race for these cars.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 04:35 PM   #9
Evan Smith
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Jim W,

Respectfully, who gave you this info on the pulleys? Why is it that everyone has all this information and no sources to back it up. Hearsay is CRAP! This must be a really smart person who fed you this because they don't know the first thing about late-model supercharged vehicles. The CJ does not use a cogged blower drive, so there are no teeth to speak. Have fun counting those teeth! This goes for the drive pulley, or the driven pulley as the blower is driven by a serpentine belt with a sprung tensioner.

Furthermore, the rulebook states "aftermarket pulleys permitted." It currently says nothing about pulleys used to drive blowers, nor does it state anything on NHRA.com. Where do you people get this information from? Please, I know many of you are bothered by the CJ, but if you are going to come on here and post, at least properly inform yourself in order to sound intelligent about the topic and list facts backed up with a legitimate source. Only then will you be taken seriously.

And who is "loading them down with weight." Simple physics, a lighter object can be accelerated quicker than a heavier one.

Evan
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK
Evan Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 04:50 PM   #10
goinbroke2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 902
Likes: 1,715
Liked 405 Times in 158 Posts
Default Re: Mustang MPH?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan Smith View Post
Jim W,

Respectfully, who gave you this info on the pulleys? Why is it that everyone has all this information and no sources to back it up. Hearsay is CRAP! This must be a really smart person who fed you this because they don't know the first thing about late-model supercharged vehicles. The CJ does not use a cogged blower drive, so there are no teeth to speak. Have fun counting those teeth! This goes for the drive pulley, or the driven pulley as the blower is driven by a serpentine belt with a sprung tensioner.

Furthermore, the rulebook states "aftermarket pulleys permitted." It currently says nothing about pulleys used to drive blowers, nor does it state anything on NHRA.com. Where do you people get this information from? Please, I know many of you are bothered by the CJ, but if you are going to come on here and post, at least properly inform yourself in order to sound intelligent about the topic and list facts backed up with a legitimate source. Only then will you be taken seriously.

And who is "loading them down with weight." Simple physics, a lighter object can be accelerated quicker than a heavier one.

Evan

No Evan, your wrong. They're fords, therefore they defy the laws of physic's and logic, they are evil, EVIL I TELL YOU! They have special cogged serpentine belts which add hp! I heard they put a cj engine in a dumptruck to "load it down" and it went 9 flat!!

THEY"RE EVIL!

EVIL I TELL YOU!!!!

THE VIN NUMBERS ALL START WITH V FOR VOODOO!!!


MUHAHAHAHAHA, YOU ALL WILL NOW SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES!!!

Seriously, this has been beat to death will logic and constructive input. Now it's just demonizing them.
There is nothing left to add so others will "I heard" or "I think". Again, it's all ford bashing and sour grapes unless the uproar is levelled against the turbo dodges/etc too.
goinbroke2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.