|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,915
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]()
My experience is you're better off with the heavy 4 bbl combos, rather than the lighter 2 bbl cars in about P and down.
In the classes from about O (15lbs) and up , you are better off with a lighter and lower rated 4 bbl combo, than a heavyweight wagon. In other words ,it's a 283 ,or forget it.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: pennock,mn
Posts: 83
Likes: 21
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Hi-I was short on experience when I started with my 283 and it's not a hard combo to get dialed in. Doug Schriener
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
Doug -
The wagon I found had a mixture of old and new engine parts, mostly later model 350 block and heads. The one thing it DID have was the correct intake, although the carb was a '67 Q-jet, not the one I needed. So now the plan is to get the car up and running (somehow!) with the mule motor, and build a 327(or 283, or both) for later. Not exactly how I wanted to start, but at least I'll be out there and not in the garage! ![]() Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: pennock,mn
Posts: 83
Likes: 21
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Lew-Let us know how the 327 does-I don't recall seeing this combo before-Good luck. Doug Schriener
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with the 327. I like the fact that you can use a Holley carb. and you will need the extra cubes to lug all of the weight.
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
I could be wrong,,but I'm thinking the only Holley carbed 327 in 66' was the L-79 combo, which was available in Corvettes, Chevelles, and Chevy IIs. I don't recall it being in a full size Chevy, let alone a station wagon. I'm sure somone on here will set me straight.
That L-72 427 combo would be wild, if its legal. I can see class eliminations for D/S when Ben Wenzel looks over in his 67 Z and sees a wagon in the burnout box with him! Might be one big parts breaking machine, but could be fun. My 2 cents. Danny Durham |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,915
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You won't like the fact that it was a 540 cfm Holley with the same rating as a 750 Q-jet. The 66 Chevy II did not come with the Q-jet originally. Only the Holley or AVS . The 67's came Qjet equipped ,so NHRA relented for the 66's too. I f you want more cubes ,how about a 396/325?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
Now that would be a really good combo but a load to tow!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|