|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
He's right Jeff. If you had used the west coast rulebook you could have been fast all along. Now that you're using the west coast class guide everyone has their panties in a wad.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe this can answer the question why MR Teuton GTX or road runner was slow. BOISE, Idaho - Final order after 6 rounds of qualifying in Stock Eliminator at the NHRA Lucas Oil Drag Racing Series, Northwest Division, 34th annual Napa Auto Parts Ignitor at Firebird Raceway:
Psn--Num--Class-Driver, Home Town, Machine-----------------ET---Index---(+/-) 1 7980 B/SA Steve Wann, Modesto CA, '70 GTX 10.358 11.93 -1.572 I wonder what that car would have run like at Bella Rose? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The '70 GTX / Roadrunner has the small "air grabber" hood scoop (the one that pops up).
The '69 Roadrunner gets the fiberglass hood with a big ole honkin' scoop.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
The 69 440-6 has numerous differences from the 70 440-6. Flat top pistons with no valve relief but then again its not 411 hp either. The 69 is 395. This is still a combo that has potential to perform very well. probably a good 10.50 C car. Too bad it probably could not run with the 5.9 drag pak at 284hp
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,899
Liked 5,111 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The 70 has more compression.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 2,790
Liked 2,469 Times in 695 Posts
|
![]()
NOT MUCH piston to valve clearance on 69 due to flat tops without valve relief. It would not accept a camshaft as aggressive when I ran the combo in mid 70's
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arcadia, Ca
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 48
Liked 175 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
I am a Chevy guy but -
I think Jeff Teuton knows what he is doing and I think his point is well taken Finally he has a combo that is very fast I doubt his "stuff" was ever slow do to lack of effort or money
__________________
time is our most precious resource, you can always make more money but you can never make more time spend your time wisely with the ones you love - Ron Durham Last edited by Andys dad; 09-15-2010 at 09:16 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 127
Liked 488 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
The point of the question is that the newer cars are all out of whack to the playing field of the older cars and what can be done to correct the situtation. NHRA should have put at least 100 hp to all the new combo's (DP's and CJ's) and let them loose HP as they fit into classes to be competitive. The way that they are introduced to the playing field is so out of line, that it is an embarrasment to NHRA to let it go on. I was at Indy watching the older cars that used to be competitive fall to the way side as the newer cars just ate up all the quailifing positions. Cars that where .6 and .7 under, which used to be almost 1. under, couldn't even see the top of the quailifing sheets. It was a total mockery of the HP system and a fair playing field.
Just an observer of what went on at Indy, for the racer it was a $320 entry fee to watch your combo got to the crapper! Casey Miles 248H Stock? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|