HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2011, 07:31 AM   #1
Bob Bender
VIP Member
 
Bob Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 1,602
Liked 460 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Claude Super Pro-Pro ET-Street Elim.Sound familiar??????
ED, please get back on your meds.........
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA
2010-2012 National Record Holder
Bob Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 10:48 AM   #2
Daran Summerton
Senior Member
 
Daran Summerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

I am seriously looking at P/S and running IHRA only. I agree with Alan, the cost to participate NHRA is no longer justifiable and to defeat 4-5 of the countries finest drivers to win your entry back at a points race is no longer tolerable. I like the round $ paid by IHRA and the pump gas in P/S and now the 5k races offered by IHRA for 200$ entry. NHRA is dropping car counts and doesn't appear to be troubling them at all. Its to bad, We really enjoy the Gators and Belle Rose but NHRA needs a major purse adjustment to justify the entry fees and 12$ a gal. fuel. I'd be content just to break even occasionally Looking forward to Richmond Spectacular!!!
__________________
72 cutlass
Daran Summerton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 02:16 PM   #3
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 31
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Instead of Pure Stock, this new series will be call SHOWROOM STOCK, this for the person who wants to compete at Divisional Meets, not at a bracket race(not that the're something wrong with bracket, but just want to move up). Terry, it would be advisable to tow with a trailer if you're far from home but not a prerequisite for running. I'm going to see if there is some interest from tracks owners. These car woulf not compete against Stock eliminator, this would be a showroom Stock only with tire change only allowed.Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 04:22 PM   #4
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Smile Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Instead of Pure Stock, this new series will be call SHOWROOM STOCK, this for the person who wants to compete at Divisional Meets, not at a bracket race(not that the're something wrong with bracket, but just want to move up). Terry, it would be advisable to tow with a trailer if you're far from home but not a prerequisite for running. I'm going to see if there is some interest from tracks owners. These car woulf not compete against Stock eliminator, this would be a showroom Stock only with tire change only allowed.Claude
Lots of luck.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 04:51 PM   #5
John Kelley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tightwad,TEXAS
Posts: 911
Likes: 6
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
this for the person who wants to compete at Divisional Meets, not at a bracket race(not that the're something wrong with bracket, but just want to move up).
SO.......you want to create a NEW class so you can "move up" ???
How absurd !!
Want to "move up" then run an existing class !!!
Divisionals don't need anymore classes.....
John Kelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 07:42 PM   #6
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 31
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Absurd in which way John, because of the idea or just because you don't agree. Look,how about you come up with something that will bring possibly new cars and maybe some interest in a sport that has been neglected for the past ten years or more. Well I've been attending many Divisionals and found alot of downtime between classes. Think about it " Showroom Stock Eliminator" that sounds pretty good to me. Now, where did I put those meds Ed sent me? Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 08:43 PM   #7
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Absurd in which way John, because of the idea or just because you don't agree. Look,how about you come up with something that will bring possibly new cars and maybe some interest in a sport that has been neglected for the past ten years or more. Well I've been attending many Divisionals and found alot of downtime between classes. Think about it " Showroom Stock Eliminator" that sounds pretty good to me. Now, where did I put those meds Ed sent me? Claude
Claude,any class you add that's performance orientated will require teching and specs.
Like some have said,we dont need any more classes.
Btw people,the meds I sent Claude are called "reality pills".:>):>):>)
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 09:01 PM   #8
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 31
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Thanks Ed, I've taken two like you've prescribed and I now will be sleeping much better. Thank You Dr Reality. Please check my new web site that I hope to have running soon. www.showroomstock.com and the new Tshirts will be available at Indy. Two great quotes:Just because It hasn't been done yet, doesn't mean it's impossible and whether you think you can or can't you're right.( Henry Ford) Claude
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 09:21 PM   #9
John Kelley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tightwad,TEXAS
Posts: 911
Likes: 6
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Absurd in which way John, because of the idea or just because you don't agree. Look,how about you come up with something that will bring possibly new cars and maybe some interest in a sport that has been neglected for the past ten years or more. Well I've been attending many Divisionals and found alot of downtime between classes. Think about it " Showroom Stock Eliminator" that sounds pretty good to me. Now, where did I put those meds Ed sent me? Claude
With ELEVEN classes at a divisional no more are needed !!
It takes forever to run the throttle stop classes alone !! And then the needless "bike" bracket class.
And you want to add a class with no tech or teardownns ??
Like no one would ever cheat ?...................... HA !!
John Kelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 11:23 PM   #10
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 31
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock at divisionals, why not?

Considering that the owners of the track are the one who have to guarantee the whole purse and have to kick some money up to NHRA, how long before they say , thank you but no thank you for putting on a divisional. Think about it.
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.