HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2012, 04:22 PM   #1
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I suggest solid roller cam, because in the long run, are less cost. 750 legal carb, cast available to the public intake, no external work, steel, or aluminum rods, cost would be the same, any stroke to avoid teardowns, angle milling, and polishing combustion chamber, any valve job not to go lower then manufacturers cnc cut, no crank trigger, vac pump, or external oil pump, stock type pump only, no billet, maximum 2 inch carb spacer, no rubber spacers, plastic or aluminum only, no computers, or hook ups for computers, single disc clutch, min. 10 inch, no titanium drive line parts, or carbon fiber brakes, carbon fiber limited to the drive shaft, min. cubes, 286, because of the 3000 lb. weight min. in SS\CS, stud mounted rockers only, with the exception of mopar, I like 5 forward gears, because or the action, EVERY gear, clutch must be used Think of the cam companys that would get involved with that. I think with flat tops, we could see ten 0's maybe. Let me know what you think. You will be hard pressed to get 10 to 1 out of the brodix head, believe me. All could be checked with a snap-on scope, and the head exchange will eliminate any exotic work. Let me know what you think.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 04:29 PM   #2
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

We could go so far as no knife edging on the crank, stock lifter size, stock cam diameter, and stock firing order, and steel pans only. All could be checked with an access hole in the pan.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 04:42 PM   #3
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Only Stick? Auto with Brake? No handicap? Line loc okay.what did they cost?
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 04:50 PM   #4
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

No, automatics are ok with me, but you would absolutely have to give the 2 speed a weight brake. Not so concerned with the 3 speed high dollar autos, but in this situation, a 2 speed will be at a disadvantage to a clutch. Line locs fine with me.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 07:37 PM   #5
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

PG cars got 100 lb lighter car in Modified before didnt they? or was it more?
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:23 PM   #6
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
PG cars got 100 lb lighter car in Modified before didnt they? or was it more?
This is the way the current rules read:

WEIGHT
Cars with fully automatic transmissions with converter may remove
up to 5 percent or 250 pounds, whichever is less, from regular class
weight; may be under posted minimum weight. Cars weighed with
driver; minimum weight includes driver.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 11:12 PM   #7
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

But I think that's rated against a clutchless now, am I right?
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 07:30 AM   #8
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

With all the support here and good ideas they are varied levels of motor cost and complexity. Should a poll be taken of most important factors for the cars? Cost, simplicity by sealing them, claimer heads ok, etc?
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:49 AM   #9
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Dick, my vote has got to be claimer heads, with a $500 exchange. It's simple, and logical. Also, it doesn't take hard work out of the equation. Sealed, or claimer motors destroys all that. Also, heads is what keeps most out of comp. They change designs seems like weekly. Also, I think it's important to keep the visual performance parts to a minimal, as we've discussed. I think a spec tire, fuel, and possibly rear gear, as long as it's entertaining. I love the fact that brodix evened up the competition, to where no one can bitch. Also, things I've brought up would keep valve train cost affordable.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:52 AM   #10
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
With all the support here and good ideas they are varied levels of motor cost and complexity. Should a poll be taken of most important factors for the cars? Cost, simplicity by sealing them, claimer heads ok, etc?
Just like Randy said, let's start with a Spec cylinder head:

http://www.brodix.com/heads/spec.php

Then: no Titanium valves, no external oil pump, no sheet metal intake only cast intake, one single 750 CFM carb, no crank trigger, no external vacuum pump, any compression, limit tire width to 11.5", 358 CID max engine. Must maintain OEM cylinder bore spacing, OEM engine deck height and engine block must have a OEM part number.

I think this would maintain an even competition and keep costs down for the class.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.