|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Is the case being made that the parts in question are correct and backed up by legitimate sources, or that 'other cars have illegitimate parts and therefore it is ok'? Or is the argument that parts are unavailable and superceded parts are deemed necessary? If the latter, parts with improved performance capabilities should carry additional horsepower, as has been done with some aftermarket heads, etc.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() ![]() It appears that it was an over the counter option that other makes of cars have got approved and I believe no different to what NHRA has allowed for use as applicable to the 1962 Plymouth with the 383 - Two/4BBL, another over the counter parts package and other allowances such as the aluminum intakes for the 273 Chrysler, Fords, Single 4BBl Hemi and many others. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|