|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 880
Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
It's fun listening to the whinning when the big 3 cars have been getting enhancements since the stoneage.Allow the dealer parts,if documented and put a factor on them and go on to whinning about something else,like PAYOUTS.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,604 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
But "put a factor on them"! The AHFS won't fix them. i think that 10 for the carb, 10 for the intake, 10 for the cam and 10 for the heads sounds about right. That way, somebody can build an AMX at 355 HP and see if it's competitive. If it's not then ask for HP back and the AHFS has fixed it the right way. Sounds fair to me, want to start a new thread about payouts?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K Last edited by Billy Nees; 09-10-2012 at 07:54 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 703
Likes: 449
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
Well the aluminum headed 396s do have a higher HP rating
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
Looking back at the parts books from 1970 would be an eye opener. I know more about Chevys because I worked two summers at the Chevy dealership in my hometown. I spent $26 for a 327/350 hp cam for a 283 in 1967. If you go by what's in the parts books and not how the cars came from the factory things would be a whole lot different. The 396 guys could run the zl-1 cam and the 850 carb. The small block guys would get the off road cam which was made for the trans am cars. All the manufacturers had high performance items in their parts books but they were never allowed into stock until the last few years. The reason that these parts were not in the NHRA class guide is that first they didn't come from the factory that way and second Farmer would have never and didn't put them in the guide.
Oh and by the way, the police interceptor manifold was only approved for the cobra jets for super stock and not stock in 1968. To suddenly after 40 plus years find these documents that support letting these parts in is a little suspect at best.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
Greg, not that I'm a FFFord guy but the original 50 681/2 CJs had aluminium intakes. The passenger cars didn't but, NHRA isn't going to start checking VIN#s to see which are which so they let all of the 68s have them. The 69s shouldn't have gotten the aluminium intakes.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
As I remember the BIg Block Chevrolets received a crate motor intake that was much bigger and better than the stock one with no HP penalty. I think it was off of the 502 crate engine. Those cars are going 9.60's not bad as well. Not to much outrage about that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|