HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2012, 04:38 PM   #1
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 132
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

No rollbar required if you run 10.00 @ 134 MPH ?

^^^^ does not apply to S/SS

I saw this on page 10 about their Street Legal program and the way I interprupt it to mean is that if you run that series and have a 2008 or newer car (that is un-altered) you do not need a rollbar to run up to 10.0 flat @ 134 . (excluding convertibles and t-top cars)

I'm sure the 2013 GT500 owners as well as the 2012 ZL1 owners will thank NHRA.

Screenshot:


__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 06:17 PM   #2
John H186
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 154
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Is an automatic now legal in a car that was only offered from the factory with a stick such as the 1993 Cobra Mustang? That combo was only made with a five speed but would be killer with a C4.
__________________
John Hedenburg H186
John H186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 06:46 PM   #3
Terry Cain
Senior Member
 
Terry Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 778
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by John H186 View Post
Is an automatic now legal in a car that was only offered from the factory with a stick such as the 1993 Cobra Mustang? That combo was only made with a five speed but would be killer with a C4.
Wept, the way I understand it, (without help from my attorney) is NOPE.
__________________
Terry Cain ???? STK
tcain19689585@gmail.com
Terry Cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 09:10 PM   #4
SuperCarFan
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
No rollbar required if you run 10.00 @ 134 MPH ?

^^^^ does not apply to S/SS

I saw this on page 10 about their Street Legal program and the way I interprupt it to mean is that if you run that series and have a 2008 or newer car (that is un-altered) you do not need a rollbar to run up to 10.0 flat @ 134 . (excluding convertibles and t-top cars)

I'm sure the 2013 GT500 owners as well as the 2012 ZL1 owners will thank NHRA.

Screenshot:


Wonder how many tracks will buy into, as I assume to keep their insurance in affect, they have to police what "unaltered" means.
SuperCarFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 11:50 AM   #5
boostedf22c
Member
 
boostedf22c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lebanon, IN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
No rollbar required if you run 10.00 @ 134 MPH ?

^^^^ does not apply to S/SS

I saw this on page 10 about their Street Legal program and the way I interprupt it to mean is that if you run that series and have a 2008 or newer car (that is un-altered) you do not need a rollbar to run up to 10.0 flat @ 134 . (excluding convertibles and t-top cars)

I'm sure the 2013 GT500 owners as well as the 2012 ZL1 owners will thank NHRA.

Screenshot:


This REALLY needed to be done for the newer cars. Especially with their "out of the box, bolt on" performance capabilities.

The cars are built A LOT better/stronger than they used to be in regards to an impact.
__________________
Carey Bales
316D DD/AT
www.racetactics.net
boostedf22c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 01:24 PM   #6
treessavoy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

I've heard all the talk but has anyone confirmed the aftermarket seat rule and is it only for original bucket seat cars or bench seat cars also?

JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree
treessavoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 01:56 PM   #7
Neil Smedley
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 163
Likes: 32
Liked 22 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Would not the rules be the same for everyone ?..............Sorry....could not resist a little humor
Neil Smedley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 03:56 PM   #8
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 3,601
Liked 7,780 Times in 1,743 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Smedley View Post
Would not the rules be the same for everyone ?..............Sorry....could not resist a little humor
Neil, just what is it that you're trying to say? I've always found the NHRA to be exactly like FOX News, Fair and Balanced. ;<)
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 06:39 PM   #9
426Fred
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sewell, New Jersey
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

I sent an e-mail also to my local technical director asking if the Kirkey seat would be ok if properly installed . I was told that the rules did not say "approved" aftermarket seats so the seat I selected should be ok. I was asked to send in a picture of the seat I wanted to use which I immeadiately did. Haven't heard back from them since I sent in the picture. I guess they may be refining the rule change.

The Kirkey seat will not even remotely look stock in my 64 Savoy but I like the idea of being a whole lot safer in the Kirkey seat rather than sliding around on a 50 year old bench seat. Being able to move a lot of weight to the back of the car is nice too.
__________________
Fred Palumbo
1025 STK
426Fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 07:03 PM   #10
fredjohnston
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Rules amendments 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by 426Fred View Post
I Being able to move a lot of weight to the back of the car is nice too.
NHRA should reinstate the 50/50 weight rule for Stock Eliminator to prevent this.
fredjohnston is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.