|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 894
Likes: 687
Liked 1,034 Times in 368 Posts
|
![]()
Nitro
I'm courious, look up and see how many RWD GT cars won class at Indy last year....That would be a better baromometer than that list you put up...Or look at the qualifying sheet at Indy, that way,they are all on the same track and conditions....Jeff
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 83
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]()
I would be hesitant to single out FWD conversion cars for cheating on floorpan rules, there have been numerous photos of conventional SS chassis builds (even on this website) that show blatant floorpan replacement. Have you noticed how low to the ground some of the 60's era cars have gotten? Crawl underneath most 60's era cars with a tape measure and tell me how you legally can get framerails and shocks in place without raising the floorpan? The area between the framerails is getting raised, carpeting does wonders at covering up shiney new non-factory sheetmetal.
Don't get me wrong, I agree that FWD conversion cars have an advantage as far as rules are concerned and every year the rule interpretation seems to be getting a little looser. I didn't build my FWD conversion car that long ago and it's a dinosaur compared to what is being allowed now. Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seymour, IN
Posts: 114
Likes: 11
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
5 RWD GT cars won class at Indy out of 13 GT classes that had more than one car.
__________________
Ryan Haag SS/EA 3750 E/SA 3750 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 83
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]()
Actually, I would question if some of the chassis builders even view the spec for a Comp type Super Mod chassis and an SS type Modifed chassis as being any different. I think they are pretty much 'stamping' them out of the same mold...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As a matter of fact, a respected chassis builder shared with me it is easier for him to build a Comp Super Mod car than a legal SS/GT/Modified chassis, especially regarding the floor and rear suspension allowances given to Comp class. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 825
Likes: 136
Liked 535 Times in 86 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I don't think separating FWD & RWD platforms was a bad idea at all.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seymour, IN
Posts: 114
Likes: 11
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Bryan,
Do you really consider your car a disadvantage over a newer Cobalt or something equivalent ? I can understand if it's a 67 Camaro like I have vs. a Cobalt.
__________________
Ryan Haag SS/EA 3750 E/SA 3750 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greencastle pa
Posts: 215
Likes: 88
Liked 439 Times in 69 Posts
|
![]()
...
Last edited by Herbie Null; 07-12-2014 at 07:31 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|