|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Don't know about the block situation. But the heads flow great. We've had a couple sets on the bench that we've done flow over 300cfm @.700 without getting really crazy with them with the stock size valves. Could be a pretty interesting combination I think.
Rick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 104
Likes: 2
Liked 18 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Removed
__________________
Bryan Broaddus 7568 STK ,SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 11
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I think the aftermarket block would be my choice on this build. and the heads have great potential. I am just not sure if the throttle body can support the airflow demands. Maybe a sheet metal intake can overcome the throttle body size. I would like to see the motor make between 680 to 700 hp. I think the heads can support that, the question is the other components. I think peak power may be in the 7800- 7900 range.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 371
Liked 319 Times in 108 Posts
|
![]()
If you are talking 300@28'', if throttle body and intake don't cut back air flow, I calculate around 611 HP @ 8759 rpm, this is calculated using superflow's formulas for HP and peak rpm for HP based on airflow and cubic inch.
Mike Taylor 3601 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 11
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Mike, I forgot about those calculations. I have used those in the past and I have found that you may have to multiply the horsepower by the volumetric efficiency to get close to real world numbers. The rpm side was usually close. I didn't think with the longer stroke of the 5.3 that it would need to rpm that high.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
You're kidding, right?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 371
Liked 319 Times in 108 Posts
|
![]()
Those formulas make real world numbers on the superflow I use,stock configuration heads using stock valve locations and angles about 99% of time will make within 5 hp of formula.
When you get into raised runners,18 degrees etc, spread ports,big chief style etc. then they make more than calculated. LS engines I don't have any dyno info on them,don't know if will just make calculation or more. I always check head on flow bench when I know I will run a engine on dyno,so I know what hp to expect. as example a small block i had heads went 275 @ 25'' calculates 594 made it made 596. Mike Taylor 3601 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Mike,
I have found the LS heads make more power than the formulas for traditional heads. More like RR and spread port heads. I have a fudge factor when doing LS engine models. I believe his concerns with the T-Body air flow are justified, but not as important as with traditional heads. I've never done a carb or injected restricted LS engine. The closest I done to a restricted one is a 5.7 bracket deal with a good 750.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|