|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
1.625" Chrome Moly is .083" wall is 1.367 # per foot The weigh savings comes from the fact that you are using a thinner wall material. However in this case the Chrome Moly cage will weigh 29.1% less than Mild Steel. Tom Last edited by PROSTOCKTOM; 08-30-2016 at 10:07 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 894
Liked 886 Times in 238 Posts
|
![]()
I usually use the 33% figure as a rule of thumb, since most cars done in the last 20 years have .134"wall ERW tube instead of .120 DOM
Average chrome moly roll cage weighs around the same as a .134" wall mild steel roll bar. The added safety from a cage in a car like a shoebox Nova is worth the price and even a few pounds. It's not just how fast you are going any more, you have to consider the 150+mph bullet on 9" tires in the other lane .
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,296
Liked 1,440 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
Our Nova really benefited from a cage compared to when it had a moly bar in it. They are not the strongest cars. I believe there is a rule change in stock that might allow you to extend the bar past the firewall now. Worth checking it out.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 104
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|