|
|
|
|
10-23-2017, 08:06 PM
|
#1 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1,075
Liked 482 Times in 159 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2017, 08:24 PM
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 68
Likes: 166
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
I think if you check rod bolt and rod beam c to c. stretch
regularly, should not be an issue. Bob |
|
|
|
|
10-29-2017, 09:56 AM
|
#3 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Manley rods are very nice, and lighter than the Eagle & Scat rods I weighed for mine.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
|
|
|
10-29-2017, 11:18 PM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Manley doesn't make a connecting rod for the Ford 302/5.0L engine anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2017, 11:50 PM
|
#5 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2017, 06:17 PM
|
#6 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
In the NHRA Approved Rod List, it shows Manley P/N 14121 **. The ** has a note that says: "Rod Identified with ** discontinued by Manufacturer - this rod accepted by NHRA as a legal accepted replacement rod" |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
