|
|
|
|
10-23-2017, 07:08 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 885
Likes: 1,571
Liked 384 Times in 149 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
I had eagle rods in a 289, they looked like new too, as I ran over them. lol.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2017, 08:06 PM
|
#2 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1,068
Liked 481 Times in 158 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2017, 08:24 PM
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 68
Likes: 166
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
I think if you check rod bolt and rod beam c to c. stretch
regularly, should not be an issue. Bob |
|
|
|
|
10-29-2017, 09:56 AM
|
#4 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Manley rods are very nice, and lighter than the Eagle & Scat rods I weighed for mine.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
|
|
|
10-29-2017, 11:18 PM
|
#5 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Manley doesn't make a connecting rod for the Ford 302/5.0L engine anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2017, 11:50 PM
|
#6 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2017, 06:17 PM
|
#7 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
In the NHRA Approved Rod List, it shows Manley P/N 14121 **. The ** has a note that says: "Rod Identified with ** discontinued by Manufacturer - this rod accepted by NHRA as a legal accepted replacement rod" |
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2017, 08:36 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ga.
Posts: 521
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: connecting rods
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
