|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Isn't the Camaro/Nova LT1 the same as the Vette 350/370?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
Yes and rated10 hp more and stick only
Last edited by junior barns; 01-22-2021 at 12:33 AM. Reason: Spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 233
Liked 804 Times in 168 Posts
|
![]()
The same basic motor is available in the 70 Camaro, 69 Corvette and 70 corvette, the 69 corvette has another .030 intake lift if I remember correctly. Ratings vary greatly , 320- 400 . I own and race a 69 Corvette with a 427, I considered the LT1, but at a ridiculous 400 rating, ain't happening. I went thru the proper channels and the answer was that the only way to get a reduction was to build the car and race it. Oh well,,
Glad to see the Nova get the LT1, looking forward to seeing them being raced.
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 78
Likes: 288
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Does the other one get hp with the same engine? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3,616
Liked 7,891 Times in 1,753 Posts
|
![]()
No.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 78
Likes: 288
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
then how is it possible that a engine that has never been run in that car get 40 hp off?
Last edited by moparpilot; 01-23-2021 at 11:53 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3,616
Liked 7,891 Times in 1,753 Posts
|
![]()
Beyond my pay grade, ask the guy who took 65 HP off of the Street Wedge when nobody was running one.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 1,074
Liked 800 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I for one have discussed multiple times at length via email and written correspondence with NHRA that the early Camaro and '68-72 Nova (actually they are Chevy II's in '68 and Novas from '69 on) should not be considered as the same platform. They share a front sub frame and rear axle housing and that's about it....and even the rear housings have different spring perches as the springs are splayed differently front to rear. GM actually classifies them as different platforms...'F' for the Camaro and 'X' for the Nova. But the fact is, these cars were built and should have been in the Guide since 1970. The only unfortunate thing is that the weight break didn't end up in the 9.40's as some of the initial paper work on shipping weights indicated it might. ![]()
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|