|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,132
Likes: 1,605
Liked 1,914 Times in 429 Posts
|
![]()
The edit came when it struck me how far off you were from the point I was making in the post. I struggle every day trying to find parts, much less afford them, so that I can keep people racing. It's the same with every person I know in this business, especially those who are supporting class racing.
Class racing is like the Republic, it's dead if we all let it die. Class racing can survive. Hopefully the Republic can as well. I've never been one to be concerned about the cost of a paint job, the size of a rig, or the price on a store bought car or engine. I don't judge anyone that way. I've never understood the fixation with "how much the other guy has". It ain't how I measure people, and it ain't how I compete. I've been treated quite well by a lot of wealthy people in racing, a lot of successful racers, and some who are both. I've been treated well by people faster than us, and by people slower than us. I can say that I have been made to feel I belong, by people in racing who could lose the entire sum of my life's earnings and possessions, and not even miss it. Sorry, those people ain't my enemies, and most of them ain't the source of my problems, or the problems faced by class racing, or the Republic. I've got more important things to worry about. You can go right on hating on whoever you want to.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 42
Liked 183 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]()
The way I see it, for super stock only, if the follow criteria are met, what difference does it make to approve a raw casting?
Correct valve angle Correct valve placement Correct port heights Correct chamber design Correct CCs What am I missing? For those who may think the existing NHRA aluminum heads somehow better represent the factory heads they're replacing, send them to me and give me two days with a tig torch.
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 904 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS Last edited by Don Kennedy; 04-27-2023 at 06:39 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 42
Liked 183 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]()
That's it? You trying to protect that Pontiac head?
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 904 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
Correct
the correct part number and casting number for the NHRA-approved Pontiac head part number is 60587, and the casting number is 6058. The casting number is inside the valve cover near the middle head bolt 6058
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CARMEL, INDIANA
Posts: 141
Likes: 69
Liked 48 Times in 18 Posts
|
![]()
Guys,
There's a supply issue with everything now my biz and everyone is suffering those pains. We have been getting valves, just takes longer but can't get hollow stems. Took me almost a year to get titanium for my modified engine. Opening up the rules to brand x castings isn't the answer. That just gives unfair advantages without proper vetting. I say go thru approval process like always is fair and necessary. Part numbers need to be maintained and enforced! There's way more going on with the aluminum heads being used that some people dont understand. We engineer engines and cast cylinder heads and intakes and trust me there's certain rabbit hole you don't wanna START!! Blessings!! Last edited by PONTIAC'S REVENGE; 04-27-2023 at 04:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hays, Kansas
Posts: 78
Likes: 18
Liked 70 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
Let's use the Chevy aftermarket heads as an example since they are popular.
How much power do some of you guys think the aftermarket heads are making vs the OEM? And with the weight add, is it still worth ET? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 42
Liked 183 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I've always liked your car and followed GT/EA (GT/AA) pretty closely for years. The good news is that from what I can tell they're looking to get the head approved presumably with an NHRA casting number. My point was, if the valves, ports and chambers are correct after porting, what possible reason could there be to not approve it? Admittedly, a thicker casting could be used to create a much better port shape. But, that could also be achieved with grinding and filler rod in an approved head. I have no investment in this argument. I genuinely couldn't care less. It just seems to me that a porter's casting could alleviate a lot of headaches and actually cost less to port in the long run. I also see the other side of the argument, in that it could lead to an argument for billet heads down the road, which would go beyond what many consider a class that has already gone way too far.
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hays, Kansas
Posts: 78
Likes: 18
Liked 70 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
To clear up what we had in mind, the NHRA logo, it’s own part number, TRUE oem valve spacing, and available to whoever through multiple sources.
But it’s all good! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 904 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|