|
|
View Poll Results: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing? | |||
I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. My car isn't high mph anyway. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
34 | 47.89% |
I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. I'd sell my 632" and pay off my mortgage. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.41% |
I'd grudgingly accept it and race my 160 mph S/ST car in S/C. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Do you know how much I spent on this dry sump 632? I'm going Top Sportsman racing! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 5.63% |
I'd hunt down the bastard who proposed it and beat him with the dry sump off of my spare 632. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
32 | 45.07% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
1) For the racer, the timers allowed people to spend more money and have a car with an inherent advantage. Put another way, it significantly increased the cost of fielding a competitive car. Yes, we all know that you just need to cut a good light and run a 9.900 and cut a 0.000 light, but we also know that coming from behind provides a significant advantage when judging the stripe. If it were not an advantage, then why do so few people run the "old school" low-mph way? 2) We have all heard complaints of spectators that they don't like watching the .90 classes because of the timers. Some have pointed out that many spectators are just there to watch the nitro classes anyway, but I know that there were more spectators watching S/G at the national events back in the 80's (somewhere in a box I have photos of several nationals with full stands behind my car). Maybe the spectators have just changed, but they definitely watched us back then. Regards,
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bison, KS
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
What makes .90 classes hard to watch is not the delay boxes, it is the size of the delay. Lower the indexes so that the cars do not appear to break off the line and they will be much more interesting to watch, maybe even more fun to do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: who cares
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Mike....WE ARE NOT RACING IN THE 80'S ANYMORE!!! Get up to date!!!
STOP WHINNING and get your bucket of bolts out and show us how you did it in the 80's. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Don't forget the flat washers and locking nuts you use for a timer!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Its a natural progression to go faster.....live with it....We didn't buy big Reher Morrison engines overnight....we worked up to them....little by little....we started with a 427....and every year we stepped it up.... I can't go the same speed year after year...but some people don't mind it....(there are plenty of slower cars that are competitive)......the timers or engine size is not the problem...its going to the races and payouts................if you want to race in the past....go ahead....its not my problem........ ....Lets talk about something that is constructive...like payouts....class rotation...schedules.....points formats...etc...the timer discussion is a waste of keystrokes...8.90 and 9.90 are the strongest of the classes in NHRA...go to the super stock forum and suggest delay boxes.....see how that goes for ya...
CBS (you can see I'm a little stressed these days) |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
what we need is a 9.90 8.90 7.90 10.90 out the door
asta |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It is interesting that the poll is running almost even. Maybe NHRA can create a new/old class, kind of like "Coke Classsic", with rules to have us racing the old way ![]() Regards,
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
the problem is they want less classes not more......what is this distinct advantage thing.....the good racers win no matter what the rules are...or how fast the cars are.....what do you think, we just decided to spend more money on our motors....we worked hard to scrape the money together to make them faster....If you don't like what you have...figure out how to change it....changing the rules to suite yourself is not gonna do it....move on.....change the subject....I'm done
CBS |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: who cares
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Please can someone put the rock over mikes hole. Who let him out?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The judge in the divorce hearing!
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|