01-17-2009, 10:56 AM
|
#11
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,737 Times in 1,740 Posts
|
Re: Factory experimental
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich
Billy, on one hand, you are correct in that both instances are a somewhat fundamental change in the current rules.
However, for NHRA to adjust the cylinder head volumes because they told the racers a year ago they could legally do a more radical valve job in no way compares to NHRA allowing an OEM to hire a tuner to bring in a supercharged non factory production car.
The adjusting of the cylinder head volumes, if it happens, is a result of NHRA having to compensate for poor decisions they made, not only is it possible, even likely that their list of volumes has some errors, but before deciding to enact a cylinder head volume rule, they first allowed modifications to the heads long after the volumes were established.
This other train wreck, well, it pretty much speaks for itself.
|
Alan, when the SS runner volumes were originally posted they were somewhat enlarged at that time. What we NOW have is a specific number for NHRA to use as a tool to better do their job. Too big, too small, it's a number and we can't exceed that number. Just because the rules say that you can "pocket port" your "Stock" head and use a "backcut" valve doesn't mean that you have to. I've been getting told that by the "genuises" in this sport for years. If your head measures too big then I guess that you'd better put a thick valve in it or start fresh and don't get so "piggy" with the bowl hog. I will say again, "we have all brought this on ourselves by allowing a perversion of the rules for years".
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS
I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
|
|
|