|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
THE CURE......Outlaw all supercharged and turbo charged engine combos OR have a seperate class/classes for them. Then its a dial in (Bracket racing). Problem cured !!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I'll go with the seperate class, it's the only thing that makes sense. I don't understand why Ford was allowed to do this anyway, seeing that they are about to introduce a larger N/A modular motor. A proper Cobra Jet would have been to build on the new engine platform a 428ci engine with all the good stuff and been done with it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Oh great! Stick me with the 142 mph CJ's huh?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The only cure in my opinion is to follow OEM technical guidelines for boost pressure and NHRA follows it with mandatory pop-off valves calibrated and sealed by NHRA tech. If the OEM can't or won't provide the boost pressures, then they don't race. Turbo or SC engines should not be placed in a separate class as these are in fact what Detroit produces for todays market. But I also know that there is a range of acceptable boost pressures designed into these engines so they can be built to survive through warranty.
I know when I raced my '87 Shelby Z Daytona in A/FS there was an OEM boost standard for standard turbo-charged 2.2L Daytona's and another boost standard for the hi-po Shelby engine. SCCA went to the SCCA provided calibrated & sealed pop-off valves back the early 90's when the Chrysler Turbo FWD cars began dominating the circuit. Once the boost levels were kept in bay, the dominance ceased.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA tech used to measure the pulley sizes on the 57 Fords and the Studebakers.
Why can't they do that now? Does the size keep changing every week, everytime they get a new Shelby letter?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 02-15-2009 at 05:18 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 899
Likes: 1,676
Liked 403 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
Yup, this really got derailed.......
The question is not about cj's, the question is about ALL THE REST THAT IS COMING!!! You think GM or mopar won't have more turbo or supercharged cars soon? You think 2hp per cube from the factory with a smooth idle is never going to happen? How about 100hp per litre (355hp 3.5L ford)?? You can't stick your head in the ground, they are coming. Get off the cj rant, there are lots of threads already. It looks the way forward is small cubes and boost. What will happen in a few years if electric cars take off? Charge between rounds then run 10 flat? Will there be a hundred threads on the "electric cj" or will people work together to include factory offerings? So, what do you do about the NEW cars coming, seperate turbo/super class? That's one logical response. Except it adds classes. What else? Leave them in regular classes but check pully's or max boost? Good, but will everybody be satisfied tech is good enough. Anything else we could do? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=goinbroke2;
So, what do you do about the NEW cars coming, seperate turbo/super class? That's one logical response. Except it adds classes. It might add a few classes by seperating the turbo and supercharged cars from the NA cars but your going to loose a lot more classes by 2010 with the combining of stick and automatics, and the inclusion of the FWD cars with the RWD cars in thier coresponding wt class. They have already combined the trucks with the cars and the FI cars with the Carburated cars. So I dont see the problem of more classes. It will be LESS classes when all is said and done. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
All very true! Boost vs NA is a no contest! Hopefully NHRA realizes that the CJ's are severly underated and changes hp rating to 500hp. Just like they did with Butner's boosted comp car a couple of years ago. I think they lowered his index .5 tenths or so after they underestimated it the first time. A min. wt of 3920 lbs in AA/s(a) should slow those CJ's down enough. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|