HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-26-2007, 06:17 AM   #13
RJ
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
RJ,

The 70 and 71 high compression 340's have a 2.02 intake valve. The 72 and 73 low compression 340's have a 1.88 intake valve. I am assuming heads with the 2.02 valve can flow substantially more air than the 1.88 with S/S style porting.

Charlie Walc ran one of the high compression 340's in S/S years ago. He said it was a fun car, but an expensive one.
Greg, for some reason NHRA says the 2.020" intake head requires the same intake port volume as the 1.880" valved heads, so I don't know there is much there once you sink the valve/fill in the floor. The piston is the only other difference, and I can get a piston weight at or below what the low compression 340's currently run.

RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.