HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2009, 11:28 PM   #11
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Re: Turbo 350 vs. Metric 200 (stock eliminator)

Get the turbo input conversion if you are going to get a 200. The stator tube is suspect. I broke one bad at Cecil County after I spun the tires hard and it took out my good converter and turned it into junk. If you are going to buy a 200, Leo Glassbrener is the guy to use. Great giuy to deal with, and you don't have to wait long. I broke mine the Saturday before Indy, and he had one to me at my trailer Tuesday morning. I put it in right away and 2 days later won G/SA Class in a very tough field. If it wasn't for Leo and the guys at Remac I would have never have been at Indy. I have since put 60+ runs on it and never had an issue. And this is in a 3700 pound car that has run in the 10's quite a few times.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 07:21 AM   #12
Jesse Knapp
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 350 vs. Metric 200 (stock eliminator)

Thanks for all the info. Sounds like some people race the 200 behind a bigblock. I would think it wouldn't go too many passes. Too bad I sold all the 396 blocks I had a few yrs.ago. My friend Kenny, he has a tranny shop, has built every tranny I've ever raced, including the glide for my superstock car. The glide had everything possible in it (ATI) and held up quite well with a brake. Kenny advised me then to go with the turbo spline for it. He uses some of Rossler's stuff, and that's why I mentioned the Rossler name. Guess I need to look for a 200 since I only have a 350 to build.
__________________
Jesse Knapp 4899 STK, SS
Jesse Knapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 03:28 PM   #13
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 350 vs. Metric 200 (stock eliminator)

Jesse, you do not need any 396 blocks. You build a 396 for stock by pouring a production 454 block and sleeving it down to the 396 bore size. The only "old" stock piece you MUST have is a crankshaft.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 10:32 PM   #14
Jesse Knapp
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 350 vs. Metric 200 (stock eliminator)

Alan. A machinist friend told me that awhile back. The appealing part is the thick cylinder walls you get. I bet it's costly, though. I even checked my GM catalog and there is no bowtie replacement. My thing is that I sold a mint block ready to build and three spares, with the crank, heads, and gave the intake to a friend that runs a Nova stocker. I think I am going to do the 69 yr. with a 350/300-290. I have a bunch of 041 heads, 4 bolt blocks, intakes and cranks, steel or cast. Build it light as possible and run E. I don't know that anyone does that yet with a Nova. It is really nice to have all that room under the hood lol. I am a pack rat, except for the 396 stuff, for some reason. I appreciate your help and enjoy the talk.
__________________
Jesse Knapp 4899 STK, SS
Jesse Knapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 09:34 AM   #15
njk53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 350 vs. Metric 200 (stock eliminator)

Is the reciprocating mass less in a 200 than a 350? Has anyone ever used a 200 in a heavy big block car. When I say heavy I'm talking 4200lbs? Or won't the 200 withstand that type of weight. I have been thinking about that and was just wondering.
__________________
Nelson Kowal
Stock 345
njk53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 12:31 PM   #16
Bill Edgeworth
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 350 vs. Metric 200 (stock eliminator)

They are considerably lighter. The 26# I quoted earlier in the thread I think includes the weight of the case. So the exact difference I don’t know. It also depends on how you have them built McClay can build them with aluminum drums if you want to cough up considerably more money. However in a stocker he told me at best it’s only worth a couple hundredths as the 200 drums are already fairly light.
As for whether a 200 will hold up in your application I couldn’t say but they are being used behind Super Stock and Comp motors but I’m fairly sure in those applications they are seeing far more maintenance than would be expected in a stocker. Probably the biggest question is if the input shaft can take the torque of the big block. As Todd Hoven mentioned the input shaft conversion is a real good idea if you are going to run it behind a big block. And which big block will make a big difference in longevity also there is an awful big difference in torque between lets say a 402 and a LS6.
__________________
Bill Edgeworth 6471 STK
Bill Edgeworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.