|
|
View Poll Results: .031" Dykes or .043" Rings ? | |||
.031" Dykes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41 | 33.88% |
.043" .155" radial moly ring with lateral gas ports |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 32.23% |
.043" .134" radial moly ring with lateral gas ports |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 25.62% |
Other, Make suggestion |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 8.26% |
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
My LT-1 had 1/16" top ring grooves and I used std. top rings with cutback seconds and very low tension oils......I have used the .031" dykes with spacers in a 5/64" groove if I remember right in my 350/255 back in the '90's......Do the .043" rings go in a 1/16" groove with spacers.....and the rings are where the gas port grooves are cut ? .......the spacer would be pretty thin and I have no experience or knowledge of the gas ported ring setup. Just curious about this and I might need the knowledge for a future Stocker engine project for someone else........
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|