HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2009, 05:41 PM   #1
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Thats why guys used firebirds with hood openings on ram air motors so it wasnt a "stretch" that they could open the hood. Like you said in GT you chose the weakly factored motor but you might weigh the hood or hood clearance versus the style also.
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 06:14 PM   #2
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 2,934
Liked 5,153 Times in 1,967 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Please... We already have FWD conversions. To the average fan, they don't even sound right without a fartcan.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 09:04 PM   #3
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Well I think it is wrong to assume there are no super stock fans. Not that they couldnt be developed like NASCAR fans. If NHRA or IHRA marketed us we would be way more popular. Common Sense rules would go a long way. There are tons of SS fans on the Pontiac, Ford, Chevrolet, Mopar, Buick websites that dont understand the GT car rules. I am one of them. ;-)
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 09:21 PM   #4
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
Well I think it is wrong to assume there are no super stock fans. Not that they couldnt be developed like NASCAR fans. If NHRA or IHRA marketed us we would be way more popular. Common Sense rules would go a long way. There are tons of SS fans on the Pontiac, Ford, Chevrolet, Mopar, Buick websites that dont understand the GT car rules. I am one of them. ;-)
Lynn,get real.If there were real S/SS fans around we would be racing with people in the stands,not just our friends,at divisional races.They get lured to divisionals by low/no entries and booked in shows.The
market and culture just isn't there anymore,sad to say.Kids didn't buy jap cars then,they do now in droves.NHRA and the car companies gave a ****.It's a different world now.We are becoming the modern day dinosaurs.
BTW,if NHRA cared maybe they would take you up on your so called AHFS cure.Have they called you yet?Not knocking you but facts are facts.

Ed F.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 09:30 PM   #5
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

I still think stock and super stock is a very valuable untapped resource. You could have said the same thing about NASCAR 30 years ago. If you dont sell it.....it will never be sold. Anyway I think the rule change suggestion would make hypo engines in the GT applications make way more common sense.
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:42 PM   #6
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
I still think stock and super stock is a very valuable untapped resource. You could have said the same thing about NASCAR 30 years ago. If you dont sell it.....it will never be sold. Anyway I think the rule change suggestion would make hypo engines in the GT applications make way more common sense.
In todays world the kids that would normally be coming into our sport are not interested.There are too many things to do other than spend money they don't have on the bottomless pit S/SS is becoming.they
buy Hondas now,not GM,Ford,Mopar etc.
And look at NASCAR.Their fanbase (theout) is deteriorting,no good old boy drivers,a world car and supposedly in the future a world engine.Sound like Pro Stock??????????????

Ed
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 01:14 AM   #7
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

pinks: all out
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 01:27 PM   #8
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
In todays world the kids that would normally be coming into our sport are not interested.There are too many things to do other than spend money they don't have on the bottomless pit S/SS is becoming.they
buy Hondas now,not GM,Ford,Mopar etc.
And look at NASCAR.Their fanbase (theout) is deteriorting,no good old boy drivers,a world car and supposedly in the future a world engine.Sound like Pro Stock??????????????

Ed
Ed,

If I had your attitude, the following things would have never been tried or accomplished:

1.) Stop mufflers on SSers and Sers
2.) RA-IV stocker engine down to 356 from 380HP/375HP
3.) 1973 455SD from 350HP to 325HP (from a guy running nitrous on this combo)
4.) Edelbrock replacement heads on a few Super Stockers
5.) 1970 455HO reduced to 335HP from 360HP
6.) Delay boxes stopped from SSer and Sers
7.) RA-IV engine HP down from 380HP & 370HP down to 340HP in SSers.
8.) Indian Adventure block approved for Pontiacs in S and SS.
9.) Kaufman block approved for Pontiacs in S and SS.

Nor would the following endeavors be tried:

1.) Correct statistical methods for AHFS
2.) Heads up races instead of 3 days of boring practice at Points races
3.) Edelbrock heads on stock Pontiacs to run against Edelbrock heads already existing on BBC's and 428 CJ motors.
4.) Edelbrock heads on 455SD motors and 421SD motors.
5.) RA-V heads for Modified engines
6.) A factory race engine heads up class at 6.0 and 7.0 for GT cars
7.) Factory Ram Air for Ram Air engines in GT cars.

Ed, NHRA and IHRA has been very helpful if you keep after it and it makes common sense. You must keep the glass half full instead of half empty.......or better yet as engineers always say you gotta get the right size glass for the job!

One thing I will bet you for sure......if we dont try it wont happen, and if it doesnt happen, it wont be because we didnt try.
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS

Last edited by Lynn A McCarty; 06-27-2009 at 01:50 PM.
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:09 PM   #9
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Lynn,get real.If there were real S/SS fans around we would be racing with people in the stands,not just our friends,at divisional races.They get lured to divisionals by low/no entries and booked in shows.The
market and culture just isn't there anymore,sad to say.Kids didn't buy jap cars then,they do now in droves.NHRA and the car companies gave a ****.It's a different world now.We are becoming the modern day dinosaurs.
BTW,if NHRA cared maybe they would take you up on your so called AHFS cure.Have they called you yet?Not knocking you but facts are facts.

Ed F.
Ed,

They arent compelled because no one on this end is supporting it. We got the mufflers stopped because everyone got behind it. If there is enough noise and support it will get a response. If we dont have NHRA supporting us Ed, we need to do it ourselves. We must get out of the attitude of waiting for someone else to do it for us.

You ought to go to Bill Bader's points race. There were tons of people in the stands. If we can add excitement like running class instead of 3 days of boring practice, maybe someone might like to watch! It will never be sold if no one ever tries to sell it.
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 08:48 AM   #10
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 925
Likes: 106
Liked 104 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: Common Sense GT car rules revision!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Please... We already have FWD conversions. To the average fan, they don't even sound right without a fartcan.
Good one Mark!!
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.