HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2009, 07:08 PM   #1
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Smile Re: Bogacki DQ

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Biebel View Post
Bill I was under the assumption 3 speeds were now allowed in some years even though P/G's were the only trans that you could get with the engine you run......Maybe I'm wrong.....I don't run Stock these days.....

I kind of assumed it becasue I see so many cars that used to be P/G's with 3 speeds in them. No way these cars can launch as hard with a 'glide......
The 3 speed automatic deal to replace the P/G is for SUPER STOCK except in the case of the 57 thru 61 Chevy big cars in stock where the "turbo glide" was deemed a 3 speed thus allowing a turbo (400, 350, 200 metric) to be a legal replacement for those cars. IE: Captian Jacks U/SA 1960 283 station wagon. Its listed in the class guide but I didnt know that a turbo glide came in a 57 ???? I thought it came in the 58 to 61 cars. I guess its because the 58 Chevys came out in late 1957 (Sept.).

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 08-21-2009 at 07:16 PM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 07:52 PM   #2
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Bogacki DQ

My daddy bought my mama a new 57. he looked at two Bel Airs, both 4 dr hdtps, and both Power Pack 220 Hp. One had a Power Glide, and the other had the Turbo with the famous GR (grade retard). He bought the Power Glide.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 07:58 PM   #3
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Bogacki DQ

1957 Was the first year for the Turboglide.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 03:18 AM   #4
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Bogacki DQ

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Janes View Post
1957 Was the first year for the Turboglide.
Thanks for the info.....The Turbo Glide must have been a rare option. Its never to late to learn something new.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 06:30 AM   #5
tgriffith
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bogacki DQ

I` d like to comment and ask a couple of questions,,,,,,first,,,I`m all for the rules in stock,,,the intergritiy of stock should be keptin tact as much as possible,,,,,,,shoot,,,if I was making the rules, stock would be thrown back to stone age,,,,,,,so if a car is a 76,,then it need 76 trim,seats,,motor

I understand as time goes by, trim packages do have to give some because of parts not being available,,and so on...

what I dont understand is a couple of items,,,,,,,,the past results show Lukes car always claimed a 68 or 69,,,,,,,,the writing of a 70 on a car that he isnt that familiar with is an easy mistake........the item I dont understand is simply this..........who gave him the weight sticker and put it on his car?????......at that point, someone should have caught that a 70 Nova couldnt run AA/SA.......OK,,,maybe not rite then but in Ihra,,,nearly as soon as you hand someone a tech card, someone is going thru the tech guide to check your info.......shouldnt this mistake been caught before the tech card hit the tower????,,,,it was obvious it was caught,,,why did they wait till after all of quailifying was over???? I can tell you first hand there is politics involved in motorsports......was this the case???.......since it was clearly a typo error.....and since it didnt effect hp/ run sheet/ or legality of his car,,why wasnt he allow to just write 69 on it????..Even though Im sure he was trying to avoid a heads up,, the 69 could run the class he desired to be in, so a reasonabe\le thinking person could plainly see there was no "scam" going on.........so why the DQ???? it would be COMPLETLY different if ANY thing changed like position on the ladder/weight/hp rating......but it wouldnt have

He took responsibility and didnt try to blame someone else but those questions above are legit questions......can you just write anything on the tech card and they dont check it....I dont have a dog in the fight ,,but when you roll across the scales, dont they have that info already posted in their book????,,,shoudlnt NHRA notified Luke on his FIRST PASS across the scales ..."sorry,,,there isnt a weight for you 70 AA/SA nova,,,,need to go see tech".....

or was someone just have a "GOD complex" and trying to teach a newbie an expensive lesson instead of trying to be helpfull?????
tgriffith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 06:46 AM   #6
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Bogacki DQ

Well said, the funny thing is Tim most of the people who complained arent on a lot of qualifing sheets well at least according to Dragracecentral.com.
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 07:39 AM   #7
chevy620
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bogacki DQ

You got that right, Herb!
Keyboard Eliminators have more time to post I guess.
chevy620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.