New rules for 2010?

X-TECH MAN · 09-22-2009, 01:56 PM

You can not make anyone or everyone happy no matter what comes about. You will always have the "HAVES and the HAVE NOTS" in racing of any kind.

bill dedman · 09-22-2009, 02:01 PM

What you say is very true, Terry, but IF NHRA was interested, and worked at it, they could do a few things to minimize the difference (in the "haves" and the "have not"s.)

I think HP at 1.00 under is the best idea I've heard, along with publishing the e.t.'s at 1,000 ft.

X-TECH MAN · 09-22-2009, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bill dedman

What you say is very true, Terry, but IF NHRA was interested, and worked at it, they could do a few things to minimize the difference (in the "haves" and the "have not"s.)

I think HP at 1.00 under is the best idea I've heard, along with publishing the e.t.'s at 1,000 ft.

Thats a mighty BIG IF !

09-22-2009, 01:56 PM	#1
X-TECH MAN Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Lake Placid, Florida Posts: 3,203 Likes: 1,047 Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts	Re: New rules for 2010? You can not make anyone or everyone happy no matter what comes about. You will always have the "HAVES and the HAVE NOTS" in racing of any kind. Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 09-22-2009 at 02:03 PM.

09-22-2009, 02:01 PM	#2
bill dedman VIP Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Conway, AR Posts: 1,739 Likes: 0 Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts	Re: New rules for 2010? What you say is very true, Terry, but IF NHRA was interested, and worked at it, they could do a few things to minimize the difference (in the "haves" and the "have not"s.) I think HP at 1.00 under is the best idea I've heard, along with publishing the e.t.'s at 1,000 ft. __________________ Bill