|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
dat4forte,
The carburetor for the D-Dart was a Holley #4160 (List #3778) Which means it had metering-plates only. A single-feed with the short transfer tube, between the front and back float bowls. It was a vacuum-only for the secondaries. The butterly openings were 1 11/16" (Primary and Secondary). Here's the confusion, what was the CFM-rating. It was 700 CFM. Holley serial #'s _776 = 600 CFM _777 = 650 CFM _778 = 700 CFM (D DART) _779 = 750 CFM _780 = 800 CFM * The D DART carburetor was equipped with a manual choke only. PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yakganistan
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
So what you are saying is the last three numbers in the list number is the CFM rating? Also, I thought the spacer between the carb and the manifold was to allow full openings of the butterflys. If that's true then why did they need to bore out the manifold? I wonder how that motor would of responded to an Edelbrock D4B? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Yes,
The Holley List #'s for the #3775, #3776, etc. coincide with the higher CFM ratings. I mis-stated earlier that the D-Dart Holley carb was a 600-CFM rated unit. I was incorrect, as I didn't check my old data sheet. It was a Holley 4160, with a 700 CFM rating. Again, more mystery surrounding the D-Dart information. Also, the carburetor wasn't just a bolt-on, from out-of-the box. It was tweaked at the factory ("Chrysler Performance Factory-Prepped"). Just what did that mean? (Next posting) PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yakganistan
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
On the Edelbrock, aluminum dual-plane high-rise intake.
Now that MANIFOLD should have been part of the standard unit for the D-Dart. Worked well in mid-range 3800 - 5800 RPM. A nice way to bolt-on an additional 15HP. Not too bad of price either ($100 back in 1971). Worked very well with our 67' 273/235 Cuda convertible/automatic car (SS/NA in 72'/73'). Only draw-back, the Carter #4295A (500 CFM) was a little under-sized. PC Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 10-15-2009 at 01:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
To Akan Hvizdos (ddartdude),
Regarding Post #12. Nothing on Ted Spehar/Ralph Costa. But one thing perplexes me? What was Jon Rasbach doing in H/SA in 1970. Now I think Lapeer Dragway didn't open until 1968. To be classified in H/S (11.00 -11.49 wt/hp) that weight factor was used by NHRA in 69'/70'/71' (3 straight years) I'm wondering if the NHRA didn't re-rate the HP for the D-Dart to 265HP at that time, giving it an 11.11 stock class factor. I remember back then, that the NHRA re-rated the 340/275HP to 290HP. Now I don't think Lapeer was an AHRA sanctioned track. But Detroit Dragway, where Ted Spehar ran was AHRA-sanctioned. PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
sJust looked at the photo of Jon and the D/Dart and it had L/SA not H/SA on the windshield. Not sure what the weight factor of it would be. Jon did put on the photo, although it was done by computer, that it was taken at Lapeer during the summer of 1970. I talked to him briefly on night and he said he didn't know what it ran back then -- but in the one picture he sent to me, his wife is standing next to thecar holding a trophy. Jon bought the car from Spehar in the Summer of 70 with the automatic already in it. He raced it a few times that summer and then sold it to Al Adam sometime in 1971. I bought it in 2002 from Al. At the time, it was at his mom's place in Reading,Pa. I think Al may have raced the car there at times. Alan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yakganistan
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by dart4forte; 10-16-2009 at 08:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
It doesn't.
What I was stating is that on Model 4160 carbs, with a List #3776 thru #3800, the CFM ratings start at 600 CFM, and ascend up to 800 CFM. As for other Holley carbs, the List #'s are over the place. Nothing symetrical. For instance, the Holley 4160 carb for the 68' Race Hemi has a List #4235 (Right side, 770 CFM carb) List #4236 (Left side, 770 CFM carb) I will not answer a Chevy question ![]() PC Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 10-17-2009 at 03:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yakganistan
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|