|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
It dosent get me fired up, and if there is a draw for a class like that for the spectators and the racers then maybe it makes sense, but its not STOCK.
I think its kinda funny that the many of the cars running competitive stock out there are as old as I am, there are obvious reasons, the "muscle car era" the factory package cars from days gone by etc. Its really been a HUGE gap that has taken Detroit 35 friggin years to catch up, EPA, Customer Demand, etc....I mean when was the last 425 crank HP Dodge out there like the SRT8 ? Or Camaro, or Mustang, 1970 ? But now those DO represent stock cars.... I believe there is a slot for everyone in racing , it dosent mean its the class they think they should be in..... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
I case you havent looked lately but STOCK isnt STOCK anyway. Just look at the new Dodge Challengers, Ford Mustangs BOTH without EPA certification and ya cant tag and register them for the street. Stock hasnt been STOCK eliminator for years. Neither is Super Stock a S/S catagory anymore. Its more like Pro Stock of the early 70's. Maybe NHRA should just change the names of the eliminators to Super Pro and Pro?
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 12-16-2009 at 03:24 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
I have been reading this thread with interest.
Can anyone update me on the latest on Ford's 352 (8.2 based) and 428 (351W based) engines as the OP was referring to ? Have they been run in competition yet ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Westfield Mass
Posts: 529
Likes: 368
Liked 425 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
Stock isn't stock. I am sorry but I have a stock carb,intake head castings, wheelbase,hood(with no scoop) trunk,doors rotating assembly that is the same as it was in 1975, (except we get after market parts to keep from braking parts) . Stock front seats,I even have a stock driveshaft. They sold my car at the dealer, and it has taken years to make it run like it does. As for those who can only make underfactored cars run under the index, so be it. I am proud off what I have done to make my car run fast.
__________________
Gary Parker 1617 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 714
Liked 417 Times in 96 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Greg |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Since they were actually sold at the GM dealers for street use, EPA certs and all, and the minimum production run no longer exists, maybe they will let the '97 SLP LT4 Pontiac Firehawks run SS. Just wishing.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|