HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2010, 07:51 AM   #1
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

If you want to run a 200, there are only a few people who build them well enough. Two of them I am familiar with are Scott McClay and Thomas Arnett. There are others, but those two guys build a 200 that will hold up to MOST Stock Eliminator cars. And yes, they are a little faster than a 350, even a really light 350.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 09:01 AM   #2
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

It is my understanding that a 350 has almost the same external dimensions as the Glide, uses 15-17 more HP just to turn the transmission than a Glide and a 350 weighs a little bit more than a glide(maybe 15-20 pounds) and you cannot use a 350 with an engine that revs over like 7000 rpm( they want to self destruct). BUT you do get that extra gear in there!!!
Now a Metric 200 has the lite weight of a Glide, you can spin the engine well over 7000 RPM like a glide , it takes about the same amount of HP to turn the trans as a Glide AND you get the benefit of the extra gear. Its weak point is UNLESS it is really beefed up it will self destruct on its own at low RPM , in a heavy vehicle, in normal everyday street use that's why GM stopped using them.
Unless you are looking to extract the last thousandth out of your car--you do not either want the hassle of the maintainence or have the ability to do trans work you might be better to go with a 350 til you hit that plateau in your level of performance where you feel you could use the extra gear that both transmissions over---Comp 387
FED 387 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 09:12 AM   #3
Bill Grubbs
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 416
Likes: 3
Liked 564 Times in 66 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by FED 387 View Post
you cannot use a 350 with an engine that revs over like 7000 rpm( they want to self destruct).
We routinely hit 7800-8200 with a TuboAction T-350, and have not had any problems in 8+ years of using them. We do however freshen them up every 200-300 runs.
Bill Grubbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 09:29 AM   #4
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

Bill---every one has their success story---yours is one of them---I'm by no means any kind of an expert on 200 vs 350 transmissions---Only that not very many if any of the Comp guys are using a 350----lotsa proflites /glides and some 200 but only ony guy I know of is/has been using a 350 and he is doing the R&D as a test vehicle for a racing trans company we all know---Comp 387
FED 387 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 10:40 AM   #5
Kenny Wigington
Senior Member
 
Kenny Wigington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cumming,Ga. USA
Posts: 967
Likes: 36
Liked 60 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

I have been very pleased with my TurboAction 200. Paul, in my opinion, is the man for those !
__________________
2894 STK
Kenny Wigington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 12:04 PM   #6
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

Nope, a 350 will not explode at RPM in excess of 7000. I've built them since 1984, and never seen one explode, and that includes a lot of race transmissions.

Nothing explodes like a TorqueFlite!!!!!!!
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 03:34 PM   #7
Caperat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CANADA
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Re: Turbo 250 or 350

Didn't Keith Lynch Run A Metric 200 or 250 something behind his 375 -- 396 B/SA with a steady diet of Royal Purple and it worked like a swiss watch? I think that it might have been a Scott McClay piece.
Caperat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 08:19 PM   #8
VORTECPRO
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado/California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo 250 or 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
If you want to run a 200, there are only a few people who build them well enough. Two of them I am familiar with are Scott McClay and Thomas Arnett. There are others, but those two guys build a 200 that will hold up to MOST Stock Eliminator cars. And yes, they are a little faster than a 350, even a really light 350.
How much quicker in a car like mine? Any 8 inch converter weights? Thanks
VORTECPRO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.