|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]()
If you want to run a 200, there are only a few people who build them well enough. Two of them I am familiar with are Scott McClay and Thomas Arnett. There are others, but those two guys build a 200 that will hold up to MOST Stock Eliminator cars. And yes, they are a little faster than a 350, even a really light 350.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
It is my understanding that a 350 has almost the same external dimensions as the Glide, uses 15-17 more HP just to turn the transmission than a Glide and a 350 weighs a little bit more than a glide(maybe 15-20 pounds) and you cannot use a 350 with an engine that revs over like 7000 rpm( they want to self destruct). BUT you do get that extra gear in there!!!
Now a Metric 200 has the lite weight of a Glide, you can spin the engine well over 7000 RPM like a glide , it takes about the same amount of HP to turn the trans as a Glide AND you get the benefit of the extra gear. Its weak point is UNLESS it is really beefed up it will self destruct on its own at low RPM , in a heavy vehicle, in normal everyday street use that's why GM stopped using them. Unless you are looking to extract the last thousandth out of your car--you do not either want the hassle of the maintainence or have the ability to do trans work you might be better to go with a 350 til you hit that plateau in your level of performance where you feel you could use the extra gear that both transmissions over---Comp 387 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 416
Likes: 3
Liked 564 Times in 66 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
Bill---every one has their success story---yours is one of them---I'm by no means any kind of an expert on 200 vs 350 transmissions---Only that not very many if any of the Comp guys are using a 350----lotsa proflites /glides and some 200 but only ony guy I know of is/has been using a 350 and he is doing the R&D as a test vehicle for a racing trans company we all know---Comp 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cumming,Ga. USA
Posts: 967
Likes: 36
Liked 60 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
I have been very pleased with my TurboAction 200. Paul, in my opinion, is the man for those !
__________________
2894 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]()
Nope, a 350 will not explode at RPM in excess of 7000. I've built them since 1984, and never seen one explode, and that includes a lot of race transmissions.
Nothing explodes like a TorqueFlite!!!!!!!
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CANADA
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Didn't Keith Lynch Run A Metric 200 or 250 something behind his 375 -- 396 B/SA with a steady diet of Royal Purple and it worked like a swiss watch? I think that it might have been a Scott McClay piece.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado/California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|