HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2010, 02:04 AM   #1
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Another issue I have not seen addressed is oil temperatures. This often does not relate to the bracket or Super Class racers as they are not "typically" running as us; the "performance based class racers".
I think you'll find a lot of the former running 50wt oils and changing the oil once or twice a season. The later will often run 10 wt oils and change it as often as every race. But maintenence, although an issue, is not the real concern I have, it's oil temperatures. Personally, per my engine builder, I don't want to see oil temps above 150 degrees based on the oil and clearances I have in the engine. He says if it hits 200 degrees, park the car until it drops. Even if it means loosing a round. Some may have a differing opinion but it's my engine and that's what I go by so I really don't care what Smokey Yunick said 30 years ago. Hardblock or similar products retain heat already.
Call it a diaper, call it a blanket, but no matter what, it's serves to retain heat in the oil pan. I see no way around this. I'd like an independent party to analyze the change in oil temp and the amount of time to cool down with a blanket as opposed to without a diaper.
And I'm with everybody else on this, I see no problem in the class. The issue in the sportsman ranks is the classes that seldom maintain their engines and continue to race when performance is suffering. A Super or Top racer that slows two tenths is more likely to adjust the throttle stop or ad more NOS than to pull the pan and inspect the engine. That always leads to trouble.
I'm sending this post to the S/SS committee
Tech@nhra.com
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 09:14 AM   #2
joe176
Senior Member
 
joe176's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 601
Likes: 36
Liked 41 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

I think I'll save money and have my bogus Impact firesuit made into a diaper !!!!!!! What Next !!!!!!!! Must be certified by Pampers at a cost $100 every two years.
__________________
Joe Franco SS176
joe176 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2010, 05:37 PM   #3
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Vic Santos,
I agree with you, below is what I posted on this subject earlier on post #44:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
Another issue I have not seen addressed is oil temperatures. This often does not relate to the bracket or Super Class racers as they are not "typically" running as us; the "performance based class racers".
I think you'll find a lot of the former running 50wt oils and changing the oil once or twice a season. The later will often run 10 wt oils and change it as often as every race. But maintenence, although an issue, is not the real concern I have, it's oil temperatures. Personally, per my engine builder, I don't want to see oil temps above 150 degrees based on the oil and clearances I have in the engine. He says if it hits 200 degrees, park the car until it drops. Even if it means loosing a round. Some may have a differing opinion but it's my engine and that's what I go by so I really don't care what Smokey Yunick said 30 years ago. Hardblock or similar products retain heat already.
Call it a diaper, call it a blanket, but no matter what, it's serves to retain heat in the oil pan. I see no way around this. I'd like an independent party to analyze the change in oil temp and the amount of time to cool down with a blanket as opposed to without a diaper.
And I'm with everybody else on this, I see no problem in the class. The issue in the sportsman ranks is the classes that seldom maintain their engines and continue to race when performance is suffering. A Super or Top racer that slows two tenths is more likely to adjust the throttle stop or ad more NOS than to pull the pan and inspect the engine. That always leads to trouble.
I'm sending this post to the S/SS committee
Tech@nhra.com
Racer 6x64,
Another prior post from a Division S/SS representative went something like this....If you are not a registered NHRA member with a current S/SS number, your opinion is not wanted by NHRA.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2010, 05:50 PM   #4
B Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Oil retention my ***. It's just a bunch of **** ( thats what diapers are for). Haven't you guys figured out what they do. Anytime we start having some real issues with things they divert our attention to crap like this and get us to stop thinking about real problems. Like the AHFS with the newer under rated cars. Especialy the one that Charlie is building. ( SORRY CHARLIE ) . I just couldn't help myself. Now if there is a real problem and it's costing money because we are not using diapers it's real easy to get most of us to put one on. Give anyone that uses a daiper a $25. discount on our entrance fee's. If there is a real problem they will save more than that with no down time from us and no extra track prep. Barry
B Parker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2010, 05:53 PM   #5
Racer 6x64
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Jeff, I am a paid member of both the NHRA and IHRA and posses a competition license in both as well. I am not sure how to take that statement. Are you asking me to leave the forum simply based on the fact that I am not class racer? Or just making me aware that the NHRA rep is not interested in hearing any pro's or con's from a non-class racer?
__________________
C. P.
2015 Drag Pack Challenger FS/C
Racer 6x64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2010, 06:13 PM   #6
Angelo DiTocco
Senior Member
 
Angelo DiTocco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 175
Liked 189 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Why not just legalize Dry Sump systems? That would at least have the added benefit of improving performance.


And VIc S......... 11 quarts ???? ...you sandbagger!
If you cut it back to like 8 quarts it might cool down a little bit quciker & Just think of how much weight you'd save LOL
__________________
Angelo DiTocco
'98 Firebird SS/HA
'98 Firebird B/SA
Angelo DiTocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2010, 07:09 PM   #7
Vic Santos
Junior Member
 
Vic Santos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Jeff Lee: Sorry but my old eyes glazed over at about posting #35. We are in total agreement.

Racer6x64: The oil temperature issue is: the hotter the oil the thinner it is. The thinner it is the it's ability to protect the engine is lessened, oil pressure is lowered, oil flow is increased (emptying the pan quicker) and more oil migrates into the cylinder. Once all of these changes are dealt with there is no "issue".

Angelo: Remember all of those engine changes Dean and I use to do? I was running 8 qts. 11 is much better and cheaper!
Vic Santos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2010, 07:20 PM   #8
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: oil retention devices

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer 6x64 View Post
Jeff, I am a paid member of both the NHRA and IHRA and posses a competition license in both as well. I am not sure how to take that statement. Are you asking me to leave the forum simply based on the fact that I am not class racer? Or just making me aware that the NHRA rep is not interested in hearing any pro's or con's from a non-class racer?
Just what I made in bold.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2010, 11:26 AM   #9
NewHemi
Senior Member
 
NewHemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: oil retention devices

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
Just what I made in bold.

Does that mean that the NHRA ACTUALLY DOES CARE about what class racers have to say?

Just asking...

David
The New Hemi Guy
NewHemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2010, 11:45 AM   #10
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: oil retention devices

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewHemi View Post
Does that mean that the NHRA ACTUALLY DOES CARE about what class racers have to say?

Just asking...

David
The New Hemi Guy
LOL.....Yeah just like the Dems over the health care issue.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.