HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2010, 09:41 PM   #41
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

I think I had one of the few smiley faces in this entire thread a few posts up. Here is a bigger one.

Last edited by Dgal; 04-15-2010 at 09:45 PM.
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2010, 11:03 PM   #42
hemidup
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

I'm glad that most are afraid of the new little Gen III Hemi's. Ford had to add a power booster to compete with the new Hemi.
__________________
Jerry Williams
NSS/A, E/S, PRO E.T. And the "Grandaddy" of Gen III Hemi Performance...The fire inside me still burn's.
hemidup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 12:08 AM   #43
SS Engine Guy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

.....and both had to come up with bogus horsepower factors to compete with the stuff already out there.
SS Engine Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 01:12 AM   #44
John Quinn
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bison, KS
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

Quote:
Originally Posted by hemidup View Post
I'm glad that most are afraid of the new little Gen III Hemi's. Ford had to add a power booster to compete with the new Hemi.
If you took a look outside of NHRA and IHRA racing you would see that most of the cars being racd by the younger crowd have power boosters. The younger crowd can't understand why you wouldn't want one. Ford is marketing to those guys.
John Quinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 02:34 AM   #45
hemidup
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Quinn View Post
If you took a look outside of NHRA and IHRA racing you would see that most of the cars being racd by the younger crowd have power boosters. The younger crowd can't understand why you wouldn't want one. Ford is marketing to those guys.
Your probably correct. Me, being a grampa of 12, the older grand kids get more of a kick from my 10 second boosted 2005 Ram 4x4 pickup than the 10 second 64 Race Hemi. I'm so old school that I don't even own a cell phone, however my grandkids know they could tune a boosted Honda Civic with a Play Station. Go figure. ???
__________________
Jerry Williams
NSS/A, E/S, PRO E.T. And the "Grandaddy" of Gen III Hemi Performance...The fire inside me still burn's.
hemidup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 02:44 AM   #46
hemidup
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS Engine Guy View Post
.....and both had to come up with bogus horsepower factors to compete with the stuff already out there.
Bogus HP factors or not, I still haven't seen where the new Challenger's or Mustang's have dominated anywhere. Have you?
__________________
Jerry Williams
NSS/A, E/S, PRO E.T. And the "Grandaddy" of Gen III Hemi Performance...The fire inside me still burn's.
hemidup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 06:28 AM   #47
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: Once again a bogus combination

Quote:
Originally Posted by hemidup View Post
Bogus HP factors or not, I still haven't seen where the new Challenger's or Mustang's have dominated anywhere. Have you?
Maybe its because the money guys who are buying these new cars cant drive a nail with a hammer much less drive a race car? Unless its a heads up run they are dead meat. LOL
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 06:35 AM   #48
Paul Ceasrine
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

Gone are the days (1968/1969) when the NHRA only re-factored the;
Mopar 340; from 275HP to 310HP
Ford 428 Cobra-Jet; from 335HP to 360HP
S/S AMX 390; from 340HP to 405HP.
My daughter was going to buy a bicycle to ride, but we heard the NHRA was going to re-factor it, before she ever rode it.
OHHH,, THE NHRA,,Where have you gone Joe Dimaggio?
PC

Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 04-16-2010 at 06:36 AM. Reason: addition
Paul Ceasrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 07:08 AM   #49
Dean Roberts
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

Greg and others, where was all this grandstanding when GM told NHRA that they built '98 Firebirds and Camaros with LT1 engines? And of course, NHRA allowed it. In fact, every racer who has ever lost a round to one of these cars has lost to a paper car that was never built from the factory. I believe NHRA was driving GMC trucks during this time.

Greg, and others, does this not bother you?
Dean Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 07:25 AM   #50
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Once again a bogus combination

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Roberts View Post
Greg and others, where was all this grandstanding when GM told NHRA that they built '98 Firebirds and Camaros with LT1 engines? And of course, NHRA allowed it. In fact, every racer who has ever lost a round to one of these cars has lost to a paper car that was never built from the factory. I believe NHRA was driving GMC trucks during this time.

Greg, and others, does this not bother you?
My 98 Firebird shows the LT-1 option in the owner's manual. Besides, the difference between a 97 F body and a 98 F body is body panels (the 98 is just a better looking car). At least it wasn't a car that was nearly 100HP under factored, or a car with an engine that was NEVER offered by the manufacturer in ANY car for street use, or a car that can never be registered for street use or even driven off the lot when purchased.

And I guess the 98 LT-1 F body deal in the past makes it "anything goes" in the future.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.