HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2010, 04:09 PM   #11
Bob Bender
VIP Member
 
Bob Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 1,589
Liked 457 Times in 90 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
Be a man and run it with a stick......lol. All kidding aside there is less competition in a stick class. With todays upgraded parts I doubt you will break it very often. Cal Method from Washington state ran a stick 283 Wagon years ago before Jerico trans, etc. and was a killer in his class.
All my old cars were "STICK" but now Im old.................... and broke.....
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA
2010-2012 National Record Holder
Bob Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 12:04 PM   #12
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Wagonboy -

I've been asking myself those same questions. I've somewhat come to the decision to build the 327 for now to run in O/SA, only because the engine in the 66 Bel Air 6-passenger wagon I bought had a mixture of correct and incorrect parts for the bigger engine, and this is my first small-block in about 30 years. I also thought that the 283 might be more of a "challenge" to get dialed-in right from the start. The stick option sounds intriguing too! Nothing quite like "two-tons 'o fun!"

Good luck and I hope to see you out there this summer!

Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 12:42 PM   #13
treessavoy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Just curious but where would this combination fall with a 427?

JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree
treessavoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 01:28 PM   #14
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Looks like G/S(A) with the 390 HP and D/S with the 425 HP (stick only). That's for the 6 passenger version.
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 12:02 AM   #15
treessavoy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

That's a lot of tonnage to launch with a stick, might have to use a rear end out of an Army 5 ton truck.

JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree
treessavoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 12:51 AM   #16
greg fulk
VIP Member
 
greg fulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Question Re: what combo is better ?

I think the 327 will do just fine....Question for you....just what do you want to do with this car?? do you want to run a Div race here & their ....maybe a National that's close to ya? Maybe run @ the local "bracket" track from week to week? or chase points?
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN"
greg fulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 12:57 AM   #17
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,846
Liked 5,003 Times in 1,903 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

My experience is you're better off with the heavy 4 bbl combos, rather than the lighter 2 bbl cars in about P and down.
In the classes from about O (15lbs) and up , you are better off with a lighter and lower rated 4 bbl combo, than a heavyweight wagon.

In other words ,it's a 283 ,or forget it.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 11:03 AM   #18
doug schriener
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: pennock,mn
Posts: 83
Likes: 21
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Hi-I was short on experience when I started with my 283 and it's not a hard combo to get dialed in. Doug Schriener
doug schriener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 11:33 AM   #19
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Doug -

The wagon I found had a mixture of old and new engine parts, mostly later model 350 block and heads. The one thing it DID have was the correct intake, although the carb was a '67 Q-jet, not the one I needed. So now the plan is to get the car up and running (somehow!) with the mule motor, and build a 327(or 283, or both) for later. Not exactly how I wanted to start, but at least I'll be out there and not in the garage!

Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 05:19 PM   #20
doug schriener
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: pennock,mn
Posts: 83
Likes: 21
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: what combo is better ?

Lew-Let us know how the 327 does-I don't recall seeing this combo before-Good luck. Doug Schriener
doug schriener is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.