|
![]() |
#231 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 418
Likes: 1
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Well, I know it was a "cop car" because it had the classic gigantic radiator and sway bar. I guess it could've been a 400 but I didn't think they started production on those until '74 or so. I have no recollection of the CFM capabilities of the carb, either. Was there more than one version?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#232 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Brett,
On the Holley 3-barrels. The popular unit is the 950cfm carb. That was the one Holley marketed. Also, a 1050cfm unit was made. Somewhat hard to find today. Many of the 1972 Plymouth/Dodge 'Police Pursuit Vehicles' utilized the 400 "B" engine. The code #E68 was somewhat under-powered with low-compression (8.2-1). Called the 'cheapie town-mountie cop car', if you had that engine. I wonder if the dealers swapped on different carb-mounting plates, and popped on the Holley 950 3-barrel, to get a liitle more power. The 'state troopers' almost always got the more potent 440 'RB' engines. Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#233 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Im not sure about the bell-housing deal you mentioned. When these cars were new there was only one stick car around where I lived and he changed to an automatic after a couple of months. The torqueflite combos were killing him with his T-85 3 speed. Even the 409's and 406 Fords could usually beat him. The old Caslers and atlas Bucrons were pretty poor tires and there was zero track prep except for using a broom on the starting line.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 04-19-2010 at 07:56 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#234 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#235 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Jim R and X-Tech Man,
You gentleman know your Mopar stuff. Someday, I've got to check out (2) old junkyards where a bunch of old Mopars are resting. All 62' thru 64' cars. Start looking under the hood. X-Tech on the 62's. I wonder if any of those cars went through 'Chrysler Chemical Engineering'? Those .038" steel fenders, doors, hood and deck lids had 'mucho steel.' PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#236 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#237 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Liberty Lake, WA, Peoria,AZ
Posts: 80
Likes: 195
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#238 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Stumbled on another one.
1966 Buick GS 401 'Nailhead' with the 340 HP. Most came through with the 325HP engine. Only a 'handful of nails' had the up-grade engine. Still fit in the same class C/S in 66', as the 325HP engine. PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#239 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
What kind of intake did it have? If I remember correctly that carb needed a special manifold or at least a modified one in order for that big secondary to open. Does that sound right?
JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#240 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,105 Times in 303 Posts
|
![]()
Yes it is.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|