1971-72 LT-1 350/315hp

Ben Kallies · 05-22-2010, 06:53 AM

Junior,

Thanks for your input. I agree that it would likely be a more competitive combination. I like the thought of more compression, solid lifters, and a nice tall intake. My biggest personal hold up is that I know I'd miss all those cubic inches and the wonderful torque that come along with them. It would be a completely different animal. I wouldn't expect to run with the new cars.

-Ben.

Greg Hill · 05-23-2010, 07:47 AM

I do run that combination. It's one of the better old chevy small block deals in my opinion. It's taken me a long time to get it to run decent. Other combinations that are better in my opinion are the 340 dusters both low and high compression and the 67-69 400 Pontiacs plus all the new cars that fit E and F.

05-22-2010, 06:53 AM	#1
Ben Kallies Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Milwaukee, WI Posts: 107 Likes: 2 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: 1971-72 LT-1 350/315hp Junior, Thanks for your input. I agree that it would likely be a more competitive combination. I like the thought of more compression, solid lifters, and a nice tall intake. My biggest personal hold up is that I know I'd miss all those cubic inches and the wonderful torque that come along with them. It would be a completely different animal. I wouldn't expect to run with the new cars. -Ben.

05-23-2010, 07:47 AM	#2
Greg Hill VIP Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Louisville , KY Posts: 1,995 Likes: 68 Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts	Re: 1971-72 LT-1 350/315hp I do run that combination. It's one of the better old chevy small block deals in my opinion. It's taken me a long time to get it to run decent. Other combinations that are better in my opinion are the 340 dusters both low and high compression and the 67-69 400 Pontiacs plus all the new cars that fit E and F. __________________ Greg Hill 4171 STK