Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

Paul Ceasrine · 06-11-2010, 12:17 PM

Jeff,
I'm a little surprised with the results of the 440 6-Barrel Cuda.
Honest results, my mother had a 1970 340 Duster, 3.23 Sure-Grip, 4-speed w/bench seat and E70 x 14" Goodyears (RWL).
My father raced it once in 1971, G/S, completely stock ran
14.38 @ 99mph. Won class,
Man, that was a good little car. Cost $3000 in May 1970.
Kept it for 4 years, never had a problem.
PC

06-11-2010, 12:17 PM	#21
Paul Ceasrine VIP Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2,546 Likes: 0 Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts	Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced? Jeff, I'm a little surprised with the results of the 440 6-Barrel Cuda. Honest results, my mother had a 1970 340 Duster, 3.23 Sure-Grip, 4-speed w/bench seat and E70 x 14" Goodyears (RWL). My father raced it once in 1971, G/S, completely stock ran 14.38 @ 99mph. Won class, Man, that was a good little car. Cost $3000 in May 1970. Kept it for 4 years, never had a problem. PC