|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 2,906
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]()
What do I think?
You asked ,so... My opinion is, whenever you have the wrong engine in the wrong body, It's b-o-r-i-n-g! That goes for GT Stock, GT Super Stock , IHRA Crate Motor, NASCAR , NMCA ...wherever.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1,599
Liked 459 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
amen
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA 2010-2012 National Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
I think it would be a nightmare for IHRA. They have trouble keeping up with the combos that already exist with the couple of guys who still care about class racing still working with them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You could always pitch the idea. I really don't understand why there is so much resistance to the crate motor cars or GT stock in NHRA . GT Super Stock for that matter has been around since the early 80's. It certainly didn't ruin the class. That's an old argument, I don't want to dredge it up again. The cars are allowed at the local combos, that's pretty much the only places I expect to attend.
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro 95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock Last edited by Robert Swartz; 07-25-2010 at 12:09 AM. Reason: grammar and spelling? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
I'm going to go against the grain of the others so far, by saying I'd like the idea as long as it would give racers who currently run fuel injectioned engines a chance to replace that system with a carbureted system...it would quicken teardowns, and just might make cars easier to adjust/tune (I know it would mine)! Oh how I'd love not having to deal with fuel injection, by being able to run an older version of my 173V6 that was carbureted...with Stock rules as they are now, it's illegal to change a fuel system that came with the make/model/year of your car, to one that didn't. The money/time I would've saved over the years...
![]()
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Williamsburg, Va.---USA
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 1,612
Liked 56 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
Don't you guys think they have enough classes Now ??? .... I agree with Terry on this one ....
__________________
Dave Ribeiro 1033 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Glen ullin ND
Posts: 62
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I think the GT cars in SS are O.K. but stock should be left alone. I think it would kind of cheapen the class.
__________________
Eric Kitzan 66 Chevelle Malibu Wagon Stocker Last edited by Eric Kitzan; 07-24-2010 at 08:00 PM. Reason: spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I agree. Got some classes now that need to be deleted. Y'all killin me now. lol.
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
Perhaps they do have too many classes (although I think it was overkill when NHRA dropped the fwd class count from 16 to 4, and then just boosted it back to 5), but I know you V8 rwd guys/gals don't care about us fwd racers (have you ever???), so that's why that statement was made (kind of reminds me about a certain political party who doesn't seem to care about "MADE IN THE USA", by allowing our liveable wage manufacturing jobs to go overseas!!! However, since they bent the rules over the years (from the 70's), to allow 2steps, wheelie bars (amongst other things), they could at least allow an option of converting a fuel injection system to a carbureted system (as long as the year, type, and engine said fuel system was in production would be known, so as to know it wasn't an aftermarket hop-up). I don't mind the class structure as it is (and I was ok with doing away with the fwd classes too, since my car could run V/SA), but it would be an optional improvement for fwd fuelie cars the same as wheelie bars are to you wheelstanding stockers...my .02 (doubled).
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|