|
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Republic,Mo
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Have you tried a stiff sidewall slick or a radial slick? Wadded up tires eat up e.t.
__________________
*** 72 Malibu *** 1.329-3.99-6.28@106.71-9.98@131 best 60ft to date-1.2997 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Massapequa, NY
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Republic,Mo
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I run a Hoosier radial slick or a MT drag radial, the MT drag radials are 1 tenth slower due to weight.
__________________
*** 72 Malibu *** 1.329-3.99-6.28@106.71-9.98@131 best 60ft to date-1.2997 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Massapequa, NY
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I was thinking of going to a 4.88 That is about as low as I could go in good air with a 29 to 30 inch tire.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Massapequa, NY
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
You might want to take a look at the converter because the way I'm figuring it it miight have some problems with slippage. Or your numbers could be wrong because the high RPM and high MPH slipage doesn't match the low RPM and low MPH. one way it is about right with 6.5 % the other goes up to about 9%... Something doesn't compute there..
If you go from 4.56 to 4.86 that is a 6% increase in ratio. That would increase your trap RPM 6 % if the MPH stays the same. Say 7100 goes to 7525 and 7400 goes to 7844. The over all gear in low gear goes from 1.80 X 4.56 = 8.20 to 1.80 X 4.86 = 8.74 The 1.98 X 4.56 = 9.02 overall low gear with no change at the finishline. That is a 10 % increase in low gear. That is much better than the 6% increase in rear gear change. You might even be able to run a turbo 350 in it. The 3 speed would make it run quicker at mid track, if it hooked.Keep in mind the 350 has a better gear spread and less weight than the T400.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 08-08-2010 at 02:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Republic,Mo
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
*** 72 Malibu *** 1.329-3.99-6.28@106.71-9.98@131 best 60ft to date-1.2997 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I'm no expert on 4-links but from other 97-98 WB cars I know of that run similar MPH's as yours, I would try a 46"-47" IC keeping your 8". That's free to try and if it doesn't work, no $$ loss.
And yes, you want the front end as free and loose as possible including the shocks. Again, it's free. Tightening the shocks comes when you have a 60' problem...opposite of your current situation.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Massapequa, NY
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Massapequa, NY
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|