2011 ahfs

Travis Miller · 11-26-2010, 09:14 AM

Here's the runs I can find in Stock for 2010 that are 1.10 or more under.

At LODRS events runs under 1.10 were 25 new and 14 old.

At National events there were 95 new and 14 old.

(As a side note, at Indy 65 runs were made by new cars at 1.10 or more under while old cars made 14 runs under.)

Since National Opens are not always listed I can only guess that the remaining 482 Stock runs of 1.10 or more under happened at those events and had to be by old cars. That means the 482 runs would account for the 6 to 1 ratio of old cars vs new cars.

While I cannot guarantee 100% accuracy in my figures, I do believe I am not very far off, except maybe for the National Opens. But then that could be the reason for the automatic hit at 1.20 under instead of 1.10 under.

Travis Miller

(Disclaimer: Opinions and figuring expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions and figuring.)

11-26-2010, 09:14 AM	#11
Travis Miller Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 478 Likes: 1 Liked 276 Times in 27 Posts	Re: 2011 ahfs Here's the runs I can find in Stock for 2010 that are 1.10 or more under. At LODRS events runs under 1.10 were 25 new and 14 old. At National events there were 95 new and 14 old. (As a side note, at Indy 65 runs were made by new cars at 1.10 or more under while old cars made 14 runs under.) Since National Opens are not always listed I can only guess that the remaining 482 Stock runs of 1.10 or more under happened at those events and had to be by old cars. That means the 482 runs would account for the 6 to 1 ratio of old cars vs new cars. While I cannot guarantee 100% accuracy in my figures, I do believe I am not very far off, except maybe for the National Opens. But then that could be the reason for the automatic hit at 1.20 under instead of 1.10 under. Travis Miller (Disclaimer: Opinions and figuring expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions and figuring.)