2011 ahfs

[Travis Miller]

Kent, you are probably right about the 13 new cars. By the end of the year 18 different new cars had been that fast. I am saying those 18 new cars made 95 runs more than 1.10 under the index.

FYI, I did not count runs of 1.10 under at altitude tracks because when factored to sea level, very very few of them are 1.10 under. However I did notice that a lot of older cars did run 1.10 under at altitude tracks before factoring to sea level. I'm sure those numbers are not included in your figures, or are they?

Travis Miller

(Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.)

[RJ Sledge]

Seems that just a year or two ago, NHRA had a complete breakdown of all runs and had them in office by Monday following all the races that were finished during the weekend.
What happened to their information gathering system ?? I thought some people from NHRA and Nitro Joe compiled all this and then it was used to calucate any and all instant hits, averages to be decided and index changes from Comp, SS and S.
Wonder what happened and why? It seems that the info gathering (or lack of) by NHRA has really slowed down. Anybody know for sure?


RJ

[fredjohnston]

Jeff, Where is this list you are using to come up with these numbers? Simply copy and paste the runs here for all to see. Kent you should have this too. If you guys are our representatives, we racers should be able to see this information.

[Nitro Joe Jackson]

to set the record straight these are the total runs for under the index for 2010
SS
-1.20 and Quicker under 28
-1.15 and Quicker under 50
-1.10 and Quicker under 108
-1.05 and Quicker under 203
-1.00 and Quicker under 396
out of total runs in SS , 11,575
Stock
-1.20 and Quicker under 81
-1.15 and Quicker under 117
-1.10 and Quicker under 229
-1.05 and Quicker under 397
-1.00 and Quicker under 689
out of total runs in Stock , 15,070

[Ed Wright]

Thanks Joe!

[fredjohnston]

Originally Posted by Nitro Joe Jackson

to set the record straight these are the total runs for under the index for 2010
SS
-1.20 and Quicker under 28
-1.15 and Quicker under 50
-1.10 and Quicker under 108
-1.05 and Quicker under 203
-1.00 and Quicker under 396
out of total runs in SS , 11,575
Stock
-1.20 and Quicker under 81
-1.15 and Quicker under 117
-1.10 and Quicker under 229
-1.05 and Quicker under 397
-1.00 and Quicker under 689
out of total runs in Stock , 15,070

Thanks Joe. Are those sea level runs or both altitude and sea level?

[Jeff Teuton]

Maybe I should post my flow numbers for all my cars, timing, cam specs, since I'm the rep. Nitro took car of that anyway. Besides, then I would have to kill all of you. It's on need toknow basis.

[MikeFicacci]

I'm not saying 1.10 under has to be 3.25% because you are talking about over a tenth with the A/B/C cars but I think a pass of 1.10 under is deserving of 5 horsepower or maybe 1.5% which would be 6 horsepower at 400 or 5 horsepower at 300. Then let a sliding scale do its work.

Instant Triggers
1.10 = 1.5% At 400 = 6 horsepower 300 = 5
1.15 = 2% At 400 = 8 horsepower 300 = 6
1.20 = 3% At 400 = 12 horsepower 300 = 9
1.25 = 4% At 400 = 16 horsepower 300 = 12

Just an idea. Maybe a bad one but hopefully it was spark something to help a failing system.

[Jim Bailey]

Mike: it's very important that you and all of your fellow Division 1 racers direct all of your ideas and opinions to your Division 1 SRAC rep and Bob Lang. JB.