HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2010, 10:53 PM   #1
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Idea????? Do away with the breakout!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Artie that's ridiculous for eliminations.Here's why
I qualify at say .65 under.I run an A car that qualifies 1.10 under.We dial and run to the end.I go .01 under and he goes .44 under.You're saying he gets the win light?That's what
it seems like your saying,that they'll be no run outs in eliminations Correct me if I'm wrong.In raceday eliminations,on a non heads up run who's going to be stupid enough to go 1.50 under?
Rereading your posts are you saying we don't dial in,we run off indexes?
Yes Eddie you run off the index no dialing. First car there wins. And while I'll agree with you if you are a 6 tenths under car a car isn't going to go 1.50 under against you.
But what about when 2 cars that can go 1.50 under run each other. The loser goes home, and they both get an afhs hit of 9.25% or .45 Do you think they will be able to run 1.50 under again? Now they should be 1.05 under.
Couple this with one class (natural only).
And I think this might work. It would sure get rid of the sandbaggers quick.
And at Indy go back to Class winners and quickest losers.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2010, 11:14 PM   #2
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Idea????? Do away with the breakout!!!!

You would get rid of sandbaggers and every car that cant run more than .85 under as they would have no reason to show up.
The really big bucks guys would just switch to the next under factored combo to stay on top after the current one gets hit.

I like the idea of these as a extra race like they did at the class nationals.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2010, 11:59 PM   #3
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Idea????? Do away with the breakout!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post
Yes Eddie you run off the index no dialing. First car there wins. And while I'll agree with you if you are a 6 tenths under car a car isn't going to go 1.50 under against you.
But what about when 2 cars that can go 1.50 under run each other. The loser goes home, and they both get an afhs hit of 9.25% or .45 Do you think they will be able to run 1.50 under again? Now they should be 1.05 under.
Couple this with one class (natural only).
And I think this might work. It would sure get rid of the sandbaggers quick.
And at Indy go back to Class winners and quickest losers.
Well Art,if they go back to that system It's been nice racing Stock for the last 11 years.
Car counts will drop in my estimation by more than 50%.
I neither have the combination nor the money to run with these guys.
The solution to the skewed hp factors and the obscure older combos that are grossly underrated is for NHRA to take the run history they have and just hand out HP where it's warrented.Drag racing welfare,probably so,but at least it would make for some closer racing.Much better than the crap that's going on now with both the old/new out of whack factors and "selective" rules interpretation through out the divisions.
For those who think I have no dog in this fight,the record was just set in my class (T/SA)
at 13.15.It was at 13.29.The fastest I've ever gone was 13.44 inkiller weather at Atco.
I have no problem what so ever with the owners of these cars.I consider them both friends.I do have a problem with the rules structure that allows cars to bomb class indexs
by this much.
There are plenty examples of this.Mostly in the upper classes by virtue of the fact that a lot of people want to go fast.
So if you want to return to the days of winners being the guys with the deepest pockets,suit yourself.It's not my cup of tea.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 03:18 AM   #4
Hagen Gary
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Idea????? Do away with the breakout!!!!

I love this idea. In fact, I'm in the stands at every race I attend because I can't afford to race that class. Its called Competition eliminator. Strap a $80,000 motor in that thing and go run Super Modified if you like this idea. As stated before, I can't handle that kind of cash. Change it for One year only, then maybe we are talking. But instead of trying to change the class rules because somebody purchased some bogus factors, maybe we should try not to let this bogus crap get into the class guides in the first place. I suggest we focus our efforts there.
Hagen Gary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 04:39 AM   #5
wildchild22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Idea????? Do away with the breakout!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by hagen gary View Post
i love this idea. In fact, i'm in the stands at every race i attend because i can't afford to race that class. Its called competition eliminator. Strap a $80,000 motor in that thing and go run super modified if you like this idea.
x2
__________________
NHRA #660
wildchild22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.