|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
But what about when 2 cars that can go 1.50 under run each other. The loser goes home, and they both get an afhs hit of 9.25% or .45 Do you think they will be able to run 1.50 under again? Now they should be 1.05 under. Couple this with one class (natural only). And I think this might work. It would sure get rid of the sandbaggers quick. And at Indy go back to Class winners and quickest losers.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
You would get rid of sandbaggers and every car that cant run more than .85 under as they would have no reason to show up.
The really big bucks guys would just switch to the next under factored combo to stay on top after the current one gets hit. I like the idea of these as a extra race like they did at the class nationals. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Car counts will drop in my estimation by more than 50%. I neither have the combination nor the money to run with these guys. The solution to the skewed hp factors and the obscure older combos that are grossly underrated is for NHRA to take the run history they have and just hand out HP where it's warrented.Drag racing welfare,probably so,but at least it would make for some closer racing.Much better than the crap that's going on now with both the old/new out of whack factors and "selective" rules interpretation through out the divisions. For those who think I have no dog in this fight,the record was just set in my class (T/SA) at 13.15.It was at 13.29.The fastest I've ever gone was 13.44 inkiller weather at Atco. I have no problem what so ever with the owners of these cars.I consider them both friends.I do have a problem with the rules structure that allows cars to bomb class indexs by this much. There are plenty examples of this.Mostly in the upper classes by virtue of the fact that a lot of people want to go fast. So if you want to return to the days of winners being the guys with the deepest pockets,suit yourself.It's not my cup of tea.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
I love this idea. In fact, I'm in the stands at every race I attend because I can't afford to race that class. Its called Competition eliminator. Strap a $80,000 motor in that thing and go run Super Modified if you like this idea. As stated before, I can't handle that kind of cash. Change it for One year only, then maybe we are talking. But instead of trying to change the class rules because somebody purchased some bogus factors, maybe we should try not to let this bogus crap get into the class guides in the first place. I suggest we focus our efforts there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
x2
__________________
NHRA #660 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|