NHRA Super Stock question.....

Stick Racing · 11-29-2010, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Lang

YES.................If your old you will have to have an EKG!!!!!!! John

Yeah, and you will get your prostate checked too. Only this time it won't cost you a bottle of wine and an expensive dinner.

______________________________________

Andy Stone 1102 A/S 1112 SS/C

countrypuppy4865 · 11-29-2010, 07:58 PM

Ed's correct. GT/G or lower must have a license regardless of the et the car runs.

dannyw · 11-30-2010, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stick Racing

Yeah, and you will get your prostate checked too. Only this time it won't cost you a bottle of wine and an expensive dinner.

______________________________________

Andy Stone 1102 A/S 1112 SS/C

LOL, I guess I better get into to shape for my cheap date.

DWJr-I hate that part....

Hagen Gary · 11-30-2010, 06:50 AM

I wonder if people start putting these DP and CJ motors in and going 9.50's in GT/JA, will NHRA change that rule too?

X-TECH MAN · 11-30-2010, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hagen Gary

I wonder if people start putting these DP and CJ motors in and going 9.50's in GT/JA, will NHRA change that rule too?

I believe one MoPar racer or 2 have already done this in GT and just not letting it all hang out.

Bryan Worner · 11-30-2010, 09:54 AM

Correct me if I'm wrong (Travis) but any class that has a car that ran in the 9's, requires a physical! When I first ran GT/GA, I did not need a physical. But shortly thereafter, I did because somebody ran quicker than 10.00 with a GT/GA. So if a H, I, or J car runs in the 9's, they will need physicals too, I think.

astikhossw · 11-30-2010, 10:12 AM

I was told by NHRA tech in cali,that if your car did not run under 9.99 in any class you did not need a license (driving test)or physical.

Ed Wright · 11-30-2010, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner

Correct me if I'm wrong (Travis) but any class that has a car that ran in the 9's, requires a physical! When I first ran GT/GA, I did not need a physical. But shortly thereafter, I did because somebody ran quicker than 10.00 with a GT/GA. So if a H, I, or J car runs in the 9's, they will need physicals too, I think.

There have been some 9.90s in SS/JA and still no physical.

11-29-2010, 07:58 PM	#2
countrypuppy4865 Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Donaldsonville, LA Posts: 980 Likes: 17 Liked 228 Times in 70 Posts	Re: NHRA Super Stock question..... Ed's correct. GT/G or lower must have a license regardless of the et the car runs. __________________ Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird

11-30-2010, 06:50 AM	#4
Hagen Gary Live Reporter Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Cajun country Posts: 339 Likes: 51 Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts	Re: NHRA Super Stock question..... I wonder if people start putting these DP and CJ motors in and going 9.50's in GT/JA, will NHRA change that rule too?

11-30-2010, 09:54 AM	#6
Bryan Worner Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Duncannon, PA Posts: 825 Likes: 135 Liked 534 Times in 86 Posts	Re: NHRA Super Stock question..... Correct me if I'm wrong (Travis) but any class that has a car that ran in the 9's, requires a physical! When I first ran GT/GA, I did not need a physical. But shortly thereafter, I did because somebody ran quicker than 10.00 with a GT/GA. So if a H, I, or J car runs in the 9's, they will need physicals too, I think.

11-30-2010, 10:12 AM	#7
astikhossw Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: moreno valley Ca Posts: 266 Likes: 2 Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts	Re: NHRA Super Stock question..... I was told by NHRA tech in cali,that if your car did not run under 9.99 in any class you did not need a license (driving test)or physical.