|
![]() |
#11 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You are allowed to trim the quarters for clearance.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Not to steal the thread...
But who's car is this (I found on Kenny Keir's site) and what class does it run? I'm suspecting SS/C.... anybody? Larry
__________________
Larry Fulton Last edited by Larry Fulton; 12-12-2010 at 12:04 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Ken built that car and it's a real SC/Rambler. It was built for SS/H with a 390 4bbl and I believe a G-Force trans.
The car was never taken to the track from all the reports I have heard. It was on ebay for around $50K by the owner. In the ad it said it was taken down the track and I believe it said 9.80's @ 138 or so. Frankly, it doesn't ad up. What I heard is the owner was afraid of the car and didn't want to drive it. That makes more sense. I also have heard from a reliable source the engine made something like 525 HP and was built by Barton Machine. That's a pretty pathetic number for a SS 390 and would not support 9.80's @ 138 MPH. So I tend to believe the guy never raced it. Then the car was sold by a dealer. I believe it sold for $50K and that included a nice enclosed trailer. I don't know who owns it but I've hear rumor it will be raced. I certainly hope so. Other than the engine, the car seems to be quite awesome. Ken Kier knows how to build a car and this would be one to own. The engine can be fixed and all it takes is more money! BTW - the '69 390 is NHRA rated now at 290 HP, 25 less than my 1970 390. It should be very competitive in SS/H and has the potential to be a class winner. That is probably the best scoop out there and it has to help. Take off the scoop and you can run it with a 343 4bbl @ 265 HP or a 290 4bbl @ 210 HP with the 290 being the favorite of the three right now; although the 390 would be the most fun. Just found the old ad: http://www.collectorcarads.com/Rambl...crambler/26768 Ad says 565 HP which is certainly better than 525 HP. Somebody needs to take it down the track! More pictures: http://www.autobarnclassiccars.com/v....aspx?Item=298
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX Last edited by Jeff Lee; 12-12-2010 at 02:02 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
When Ken first went into business back in the mid 70's he restored a nice SC/Rambler and it looked like show room quality. I remeber drooling over it.....LOL. My SS/IA 68 Camaro was the first car Ken did before he found commercial shop space to work out of. He is one of the best and I believe he could weld tin foil together....lol.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
and i promise to hammer the hell out of it ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 653
Likes: 667
Liked 178 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]()
That is one slick little Rambler.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 313
Liked 1,097 Times in 300 Posts
|
![]()
I am no AMC expert, but I believe the 69 SC/Rambler that were equipped with that scoop were functional, using a vacuum operated flapper door similar to the 1969 Torino/Cyclone and 69/70 Cougars. Is that correct? Also, I believe that the 390 SC/Ramblers were also all 4 speeds, is that also correct? Since this Rambler American 2 door sedan is shown at a NHRA santioned track, in M/SA, how is he allowed to run that scoop, functional or not? Wouldn`t that be like a 68-69 Barracuda with a 340, 383, or 440 Stocker using a SS/AH Hemi hood scoop? Or a cowl induction hood on a 67-68 Z/28, or Boss 429 scoop on a 428 CJ Mustang? Just curious.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 2,348
Liked 3,153 Times in 964 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff Lee will address I'm sure but think your correct on the SC. Think the non-functional scoop is a discretionary thing on the part of NHRA tech since it clearly offers no performance advantage. Is it technically incorrect, sure; but it would be chicken-***** to bust him on it just like it was to bust Art for his non-functional louver fenders on his Neon.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The SC/Ramblers were all 2 dr non post cars,390,4speed in A and B paint schemes.All had functional ram air setups.They built 1512 of them.They cost $2,995.Road test times were 14.30 with grandma driving.They really would go 13.90s.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Jeff for the info & link
It's Very Nice... and worth your time to check it out here... http://www.autobarnclassiccars.com/v....aspx?Item=298
__________________
Larry Fulton |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|