|
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I have nothing against the new cars as long as they are factored correctly. Nhra has thrown all of the old combinations under the bus and whatever they get, they most certainly deserve. The new cars cover from AA-M/stock, if my calculations are correct. When these guys start lining up against cars that have them covered by 4 tenths to a second, how long do you think they will spend the money to race? Maybe nhra wants this....I certainly don't know. You guys go out and go fast with a car that shouldn't be in the classification you are running, and you think you have done something. While I could join you in the new car farce, I have principles. I would never do this to the friends and competitors that I have made over the years. I didn't expect the manufacturers to have principles, because they only want to sell a car. However, I did expect the sanctioning body to have enough principle to provide a reasonably close factor for heads up races. Again, I do not know what they want, but I certainly hope they get what they deserve. Maybe someday we'll get the chance to discuss 'assclowns' and principles.
__________________
Arnold Greene IHRA/NHRA 2420 A/S, B/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|