|
|
View Poll Results: Red light poll (Revised) | |||
First car to foul loses |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
145 | 64.16% |
Worse foul loses |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
81 | 35.84% |
Voters: 226. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
|
![]() Quote:
I just checked, and per your stats, and my checks as well it appears that the Chevy Cavalier sold more cars in its first 4yrs of production (over 1.1mil.), than your Gremlin sold in 9yrs...REALLY? You're too close to that John Bonehead (Boehner) dude, you really need a vacation...maybe some warm Az. sun could do you some good, but bring your sunscreen, because one orangeman is enough...lol Oh, and per the guy who spoke of trying the fast side of handicap racing, I would if I had the bucks...trust me...
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=GarysZ24;243738]Guess again oh Edddddd, it's now 64.44% to 35.55%, so your count is getting reeled in...haha. I don't really care how this turns out, but I take great pride in the thoughts of someone who actually thought a Gremlin outsold a Cavalier, now that's LMAO FUNNY!!!
I just checked, and per your stats, and my checks as well it appears that the Chevy Cavalier sold more cars in its first 4yrs of production (over 1.1mil.), than your Gremlin sold in 9yrs...REALLY? You're too close to that John Bonehead (Boehner) dude, you really need a vacation...maybe some warm Az. sun could do you some good, but bring your sunscreen, because one orangeman is enough...lol Oh, and per the guy who spoke of trying Every post you make shows you for the petty,childish numb nuts that you are.You're the little kid that has to get in the last word. Your posts are bordering on the point of you being shown to fit into the category of whiny bitch.You worry about others who in a better position than you.Stop being a victim and learn to live in the reality of where you are in life. The poll,which you think would change from the original one,still shows about a 65% to 35% split for keeping the system as is. Besides the only thing you've been racing since you've been on here is your mouth. Bring your last cute post and let's be over with it.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA Last edited by Ed Fernandez; 03-04-2011 at 12:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
|
![]()
And you are the grouchy old man that lives inside of this site who lives to get his last word in to anyone dares to have a different opinion.
You are the guy people imagine when they picture the cliche old guy yelling 'you damn kids get off my lawn.'
__________________
2002 Division 6 High School Champion 2007 Division 6 Pro Champion 2007 Division 6 National Open Series Stock/Super Stock Champion |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 2,057
Liked 2,180 Times in 508 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
The enthusiasm for "first" in the case of the starting line, I presume this would apply to the finish line as well?
Once one vehicle breaks out, the other vehicle ought to be immune? "The first to foul, and the first to breakout are always the loser." Seems like this would be a consistent application of the notion of "first". |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Excellent logic, Mr. Bunkster. I can't imagine a valid argument against what you have suggested.
Wish I'd said that... The only instance a "first red light" makes any sense is in a heads-up race. DUH...
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 03-06-2011 at 02:44 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
actually there is a logical argument against it. If the first breakout were always the loser there would be less incentive to try and take the stripe in a bracket race. As it stands right now both cars go to the line intending to take a shot at the tree.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I can tell you the exact valid argument. Prior to dial in racing, stock and superstock ran off National Records. Then a group of complaining racers who were not winning campaigned to allow a new rule called "dial under", to level the playing field and make it fair for everyone.
But that was not fair enough for some. Change the rules again so you THINK you can win. You want to get rid of the breakout inequity? I agree. Lets change that rule. Change it back to running of the national records with no break out. Problem solved. I don't have a rule book in front of me, so correct me if I'm wrong, but a red light or lane crossing is grounds for disqualification. Going under the dial is not, it's simply a matter of doing the math. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everson, WA.
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Shawn Blair 6383 SS 634 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Sure, why not? They shouldn't have ran quicker than their dial. Just like the first person to leave shouldn't have red lighted, right? I think the red light rule should be the same as the break out rule. Either make them both first loses or both worst loses. -Toby Last edited by Toby Lang; 03-04-2011 at 01:24 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|