HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2011, 04:09 PM   #11
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

I thought the rule book said any corporate rear. I know several people who run aluminum spools.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 04:11 PM   #12
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jim wahl View Post
myron,
the answer to your question is yes. I have been paid for an aluminum rear assembly by chrysler several times, however it was when i was driving the fwd spirit. Jim
lol..............
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 04:52 PM   #13
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hill View Post
I thought the rule book said any corporate rear. I know several people who run aluminum spools.
There is no rule I'm aware of on internal components, aluminum spools are legal, from what I understand.

The only real advantage to an aluminum center section is a reduction in unsprung weight. Unless of course you use an aluminum 9" center section that accepts GM 12 bolt components.

Once again, we have bigger issues than this in the class, this is merely another minor distraction.

Do I think aluminum center sections should be legal? Not really, and certainly not if aluminum radiators and drive shafts are not legal for cars not originally equipped with them. Do I think aluminum center sections are a huge issue? Not really, so long as they are not the ones that accept 12 bolt parts.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 05:40 PM   #14
Myron Piatek
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
Post Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sam the butcher View Post
Plain and simple its a performace advantage. Gives you more weight to move around. Makes it more easy to make weight in lighter classes.
Then NHRA needs to be more specific about what they do instead of causing more questions & confusion. If they allowed Mopar to post for their aluminum center sections and pay out for their use for years, how can anybody think that they are not legal? Why would Mopar spend the money and post for something that isn't legal?

Yes, 10lbs can be a small performance advantage because it can be relocated to a better location. But it's considerably less than the aftermarket brakes that are allowed! As far as unsprung weight, the benefit is negligible in a drag car. It would be a bigger advantage in Nascar, offroad, etc. where there is considerable and constant suspension travel.
Myron Piatek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 05:43 PM   #15
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

This would be a good time to make the rules for Stock the same as Super Stock except for the engine and tires. Let roller rockers in stock, there is no reason to blow a motor up because you break a stamped steel rocker.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:09 PM   #16
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

No thanks to roller rockers in Stock Eliminator. We've got enough "performance enhancements" already. Give them roller rockers and they'll just break something else. If you're breaking enough rockers to have a recurring problem, then something is wrong. We haven't broken a rocker in 6 years, and we average around 125 runs a year.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:12 PM   #17
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Janes View Post
This would be a good time to make the rules for Stock the same as Super Stock except for the engine and tires. Let roller rockers in stock, there is no reason to blow a motor up because you break a stamped steel rocker.
UH OH......Ed. F. would not think so. Its moving toward S/S to much.......LOL. Just yanking your chain Ed to see if your awake today.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:14 PM   #18
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
No thanks to roller rockers in Stock Eliminator. We've got enough "performance enhancements" already. Give them roller rockers and they'll just break something else. If you're breaking enough rockers to have a recurring problem, then something is wrong. We haven't broken a rocker in 6 years, and we average around 125 runs a year.
Maybe you need MORE spring pressure and MORE RPM's to test the parts......
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:23 PM   #19
gmonde
Senior Member
 
gmonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 56
Liked 165 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Way View Post
No measuring and checking if you do your homework. Set the spare gear up at the shop. Keep the shims with it in the trailer. On a Dana you can spread the case or cool the ring gear, spool and bearings in a cooler of ice, slide it in after the pre setup pinion is installed, blow dry and your good to go. Been a long tine but I think we used to use .004 tight on the carrier bearings and with ice the shrinkage was just enough, Sure you might have to be under the car, but not much longer than with a chunk.
to add if they are replacing the same ratio that broke,its not a big deal as long as the pinion depth numbers marked on the pinion are the same or a 1 or 2 thousands off they can use the same shims ,dial indicate the back lash and your good ,if your picky hone your pinion bearing just so it slides on the pinion ,i use a solid pinion spacer this will allow the bearings to be tight it is some work but ,if planned its not bad gmonde
gmonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:30 PM   #20
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: REALLY, Letter to tech.

The roller rockers is actually under consideration by NHRA
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.