|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,716 Times in 1,738 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The biggest problem I have trying to get young people to try Stock and SS is the purse structure. I personally believe the ridiculous purses we are running for is the BIGGEST issue that we face (moreso than the AHFS, new cars, etc.). How can I convince someone who can go to their local track with a Bracket car that they should try building a "specialty" car, spending 3,4,5 days at some far away track where they'll pay a ridiculous entry fee to be treated like crap and in those 3,4,5 days run one race with a purse that's lower then they are used to running for locally? Exposure? Fame? We'll get no new blood (other than SLRCs) until NHRA makes it worthwhile for them to try it. We're dead, we just haven't fallen down yet.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Hagen Gary; 03-23-2011 at 10:44 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
At least IHRA rates the crate motors fairly and puts them in their own class.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
From what I gather, the risk vs reward was worth it years ago when you were doing it and my father started. How many new people have shown up out of nowhere in the last 10 years? I'm willing to bet its less than 1/10th of the people who left the sport.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
Billy -
I wholeheartedly agree with what you bring up as another major issue. In fact, I could easily argue that it is THE issue that is molding the future of Stock/SS racing. It is encouraging that regional associations are making progress in making other options for the existing racer population. IHRA is doing some good stuff, too. I do not beleive that the answer is not going to come from NHRA, however. What may be happening is the planets aligning for a good chance for a national level sportsman association/organization/racing venue. It might possibly be a coalition of several regional associations with some of the characteristics that existed for the separate divisions when NHRA first formed - identity, inter-regional competition, few but significant national races. Such an arrangement is easier to fund and likely easier to promote. What is key is a national level governing body for the assurance of consistent competition (national rules management and enforcement agency). When you think about it, NHRA could provide that sanctioning role and rules management, but not be the race company. That would look more like what SEMA does for equipment sanctioning. Also, it seems that part of an answer lies in getting some program going that could be implemented at the local or semi-local level that would be foundational for supporting broader geographic competition. March Madness would not be as big a deal without the SEC, the Big Ten, etc. and their contests. Thinking out loud. Last edited by Dwight Southerland; 03-23-2011 at 12:35 PM. Reason: clarification |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
|
![]()
Interesting concept about regional S/SS series coming together as "conferences" in 3-5 "national races" with a year-end October Madness....the mistrust of a national group (SRA etc) would be mitigated by the local trust and vetting....couldn't afford an annualized tech crew, but for a handful of national get-togethers I could see paying a recognized tech overseer (Wesley, Travis) to "keep-'em-honest"
A payout could be patterned after the "buy-in" poker series, and/or from dollars saved from NHRA fees The BIG problem as I see it, is access to the super tracks we have all come to enjoy which I'm afraid we would be locked out of just dreaming |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 240
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Randall & Dwight, I dont think its a dream or a passing thought. As nhra looses its grip and pushes traditional S & SS away we as a large group could then form our own deal. At that point Alex Denysenko type races can be run just like ADRL .
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Yes, years ago if you won Indy, and had to bomb your record in the final to win, you could build a different car with what you won. Still pays about the number of dollars, but they aren't worth much anymore. Ten grand in 1970 would build another car if you did your own work, and most of us did back then..
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 03-23-2011 at 02:19 PM. Reason: Still can't spell.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|