worst red light debate, again!

[bill dedman]

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez

Quote Mr Bill:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Every time this thing goes around, it gains a little more support. It's now down to the point that the only people who don't think changing to a worse red light are:"

.Bill thinks his illusion of grandeur gains momentum every time he starts it again.I'm figuring he'll have enough believers in about 2075,just in time for the final extermination of the world by the two remaining super powers left on earth,Biafra and Nepal.Of course drag racing will only be in ancient history books,like chariot racing.Bill you're a piece of work.

Ed, every time you post one of your impertinent character assassinations ("Bill, you're a piece of work") without any explanation as to why you disagree with me, it just illustrates that my contention, # 5. "people who just like to argue, for whatever the reason, and will continue to argue long after the facts have become clear to them. (Are you listening, ED???)" is alive and well in New Joisey.

This is your chance to prove that this worse red light idea is a bad one and won't work.

Now, tell me, Mr. Ed, what is it about changing to a worse red light rule that 1. is a bad idea, and 2. Why it wouldn't be an improvement over what we have, now (First red light loses, in handicap racing.)

Just lay it all out, with the reasons you think it shouldn't be done,].

I'll be waiting (as will everyone else) for your opinions and ideas on this subject. I know you MUST have them, because you've been such an outspoken and vehement critic of that new system, from day one. You have written REAMS about how it is a bad idea, without ever really revealing one iota about what it is you think about that new system that is unworkable, and why it is not something that should happen.

If I have missed something, in all your many notes, please fill me in. I have never seen ANYTHING of that nature, from you. Your M.O. has been to attack my character, logic, and generally, write insulting, baseless, grandstanding replies, the main thrust of which has been to change the subject, since you didn't have anything concrete to say about the subject...

Ambiguity and obfuscation.... look 'em up.