HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2011, 08:50 PM   #451
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
One more time Bill...Why are YOU not petitioning NHRA's for this?
Can't you stand on your own two feet and move forward? What are you afraid of?
You remind me of the guy in the back of the room prodding others to ask for longer breaks, more pay, more or less whatever, hoping that if somebody has to fall on a sword it will be somebody besides himself. Somebody with some balls get's suckered in, looses his job and your the one that says "Man, that just wasn't fair..."
Get on it today. NHRA is open another 3 hours. It's Monday. That gives more than enough time for somebody to return your phone call. Here, I'll make it easy on you:
626-914-8963 or tech@nhra.com
Jeff, this a discussion board, right? I think we can agree on that. It is not just a discussion board; it is a discussion board dedicated to the idea that non-racers have brains, too, and CAN have good ideas, and need a place to put those ideas out for public scrutiny. Ken created this board for just such a purpose. Ask him...

I have been able to, through my many posts here that explain the reasons why I think this "worse" red light idea could be an improvement over what we have, to use this board as Ken intended it.. Why anyone would object to using this board for the betterment of our sport is beyond me.

Some say it's boring, and a waste of time. That's their opinion, and they are surely within their rights to voice it here, but I would ask, "Why would anyone continue to read something that is boring, and a waste of time?" Nobody puts a gun to anyone's head and says, "READ THIS, OR I'LL SHOOT!" When I find a TV show on my television that bores me, I switch channels. There is an abundance of other subjects that are available on Class Racer that will inform, entertain, and educate... all one needs to do is click on them; nobody has to read this thread if it bores them.

Having said that, and I don't think there's anything in that paragraph that you would disagree with, doesn't it make you wonder why there are SO MANY posts here???? Somebody likes it... Somebody thinks it's worth discussing. A lot of "somebodies," apparently.

As far as NHRA/IHRA goes, I don't run a Class car right now, and the "quality" of people that I would be talking to at the "HRA's", don't have the perspective beyond "the company line" to entertain "outside the box" ideas from non-NHRA/IHRA racers, especially (given their financial state of affairs,) ideas that are going to cost them money (no matter, how little.)

No, I am sure that the first question he'd ask would be, "What is your membership number and what is your Permanent Number," as if that information would have ANY bearing on the quality of my suggestion(s).

Only by hearing it from a variety of sources, will this idea ever gain traction, and this forum is probably the best place for dispensing the kind of logic that is part and parcel of a worse red light rule.

Popular opinion will get this rule passed, eventually, if, indeed, it ever gets passed.

Talking to an Nhra/IHRA "official," who's relegated to answering the phones, isn't going to get it done. He's likely, already afraid for his job, and suggesting to his superiors a new rule that not only, won't make the national organization one thin dime, but will COST money to implement, isn't going to "enhance" his employment status at all... especially, at a time like this

It's not the right time for that methodology, I'm afraid. Maybe it will never be.

In the meantime, demonizing someone who is trying to help enact a rule that would make things more fair for everyone, and would hurt NO ONE probably isn't the best course of action...

My 2-cents.
__________________
Bill
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 08:55 PM   #452
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,123
Likes: 1,580
Liked 1,863 Times in 422 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kelley View Post
You don't KNOW ???
Figures........
Genius, I am the wrench behind Kevin Cradduck's orange and white 69 Camaro 427/425 AA/SA. We have two class wins, and an overall runner up at St. Louis, and two class wins at Bowling Green, all in AA/SA.

Not that there's really any reason for me to justify anything to or for you.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S

Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 05-10-2011 at 09:11 PM.
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 08:55 PM   #453
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Bill, how are you helping enact a rule? Have you contacted the Div tech people? They can tell you who to ask for, that is not afraid of loosing his job, and are nice helpful people. O got another part number Bow Tie block approved a little over a year ago. Got it approved in less that two weeks. No message board carping, just calm friendly phone calls and one letter. Painless as can be. Won't happen here. Try to approach it like an adult.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 09:02 PM   #454
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Bill, how are you helping enact a rule? Have you contacted the Div tech people? They can tell you who to ask for, that is not afraid of loosing his job, and are nice helpful people. O got another part number Bow Tie block approved a little over a year ago. Got it approved in less that two weeks. No message board carping, just calm friendly phone calls and one letter. Painless as can be. Won't happen here. Try to approach it like an adult.
Do you see any difference in the difficulty in getting a new part number approved and changing a 48 year-old rule that affects the way business is done on the starting line for EVERYONE... ??????????????

Apples and oranges. How much did it cost NHRA to approve that block?
__________________
Bill
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 09:02 PM   #455
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Cool Re: worst red light debate, again!

Now I see how our president got elected.Feed the mushrooms enough ***** and eventually they start believing whatever you spoon out.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 10:09 PM   #456
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Now I see how our president got elected.Feed the mushrooms enough ***** and eventually they start believing whatever you spoon out.
Typical Fernandez post; full of insults and impertinent information and NOT ONE WORD about the subject matter of the thread.

If you spent half as much time trying to understand the reasons why the current rule is a bad one, MAYBE you'd figure out that you're on a sinking ship...

Maybe not... You've had a lot of opportunities to figure this out, but are so busy thinking up new and clever ways to insult people, coherent thought doesn't have a chance...

Who do you think benefits from a post like that, Ed? It surely doesn't do YOUR image on this board any good.
__________________
Bill
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 10:15 PM   #457
Jim Wahl
Veteran Member
 
Jim Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 668
Liked 683 Times in 129 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jim Wahl Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Wahl
Talking Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
Typical Fernandez post; full of insults and impertinent information and NOT ONE WORD about the subject matter of the thread.

If you spent half as much time trying to understand the reasons why the current rule is a bad one, MAYBE you'd figure out that you're on a sinking ship...

Maybe not... You've had a lot of opportunities to figure this out, but are so busy thinking up new and clever ways to insult people, coherent thought doesn't have a chance...

Who do you think benefits from a post like that, Ed? It surely doesn't do YOUR image on this board any good.
Image? Ed don't need no stinking image! He just wants to talk! Jim


.
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess)
2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion
2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion
1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up
Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association.
Jim Wahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 10:38 PM   #458
Toby Lang
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
One more time Bill...Why are YOU not petitioning NHRA's for this?

Yes, he should be petitioning NHRA, but by posting about it in this forum he's already got one convert (that is if he's not levelling.) Maybe if he gets enough people to agree with him there might be enough votes to get it changed, kind of like all the people who wanted to get rid of deep staging.


-Toby
Toby Lang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 10:47 PM   #459
Don Kennedy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Toby a cool picture of your mom . i only hope your mom and my mom are discussing racing . (tie)
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS
Don Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 11:00 PM   #460
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: worst red light debate, again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
Typical Fernandez post; full of insults and impertinent information and NOT ONE WORD about the subject matter of the thread.

If you spent half as much time trying to understand the reasons why the current rule is a bad one, MAYBE you'd figure out that you're on a sinking ship...

Maybe not... You've had a lot of opportunities to figure this out, but are so busy thinking up new and clever ways to insult people, coherent thought doesn't have a chance...

Who do you think benefits from a post like that, Ed? It surely doesn't do YOUR image on this board any good.
I insult and make fun of people who deserve it.You're a lonely old guy with nothing else to do but instigate a topic that will not affect you one bit.You're what's known in the present
world as an "advocate".That stands for meddling idiots who stick their noses into peoples lives and impact it without any consequences to themselves.If you were a current of future S/SS racer I would have engaged in a civil discussion.But you're a nosey old busy body,nothing more nothing less.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.