Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Alan Roehrich · 05-10-2011, 09:09 PM

Jeff, I'd say again that A/FX thru D/FX, with A/FX at 7.0 and D/FX at 10.0 would be a good start. I think the current ratings on the new cars will work fine at 7.0, (they'll be significantly lighter than say a ZL-1 or an L-88 forced to run at 7.5 in AA) and if you were to make the A/FX index at 10.20, that would allow the new cars to go plenty fast. They'd have to go 9.00 to go 1.20 under. That gives them 0.40 more to work with than the current index for AA which is 10.60. That would let you guys hold 4 tenths over the traditional cars.

Isn't 9 flat at over 150MPH fast enough for Stock Eliminator?

05-10-2011, 09:09 PM	#29
Alan Roehrich Veteran Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Murfreesboro TN Posts: 5,124 Likes: 1,581 Liked 1,875 Times in 422 Posts	Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds? Jeff, I'd say again that A/FX thru D/FX, with A/FX at 7.0 and D/FX at 10.0 would be a good start. I think the current ratings on the new cars will work fine at 7.0, (they'll be significantly lighter than say a ZL-1 or an L-88 forced to run at 7.5 in AA) and if you were to make the A/FX index at 10.20, that would allow the new cars to go plenty fast. They'd have to go 9.00 to go 1.20 under. That gives them 0.40 more to work with than the current index for AA which is 10.60. That would let you guys hold 4 tenths over the traditional cars. Isn't 9 flat at over 150MPH fast enough for Stock Eliminator? __________________ Alan Roehrich 212A G/S