|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Are you looking for a combo to qualify well or win races? If your goal is to win, there is no doubt a late 90's early 2000's Firebird is the way to go.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Each combo has it's advantages. If you qualify #1, you can get a bye which always helps. Plus if you're the fastest in your class any heads up run is usually a win.
The 2000/later cars are good combos but must run the Mustangs and DP's. The higher classes also get to leave second and make it easier to drive the finish line. Decisions-Decisions!
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,832
Likes: 2,926
Liked 5,140 Times in 1,962 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I'm pretty sure Richard was asking about real Pontiac V8s. He already has a Chevy.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
Some other considerations might be:
68 350 now that it is refactored to 305 71-72 455 74 LeMans 350 (like Bill Rink's Ventura only at 250) I suspect that several more are good combinations with the valve job rule and current valve train technology, but $$ and the small Pontiac population have kept the development stifled. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Jericho,Vt
Posts: 207
Likes: 94
Liked 96 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
The `68 350 needs another 10 hp taken off to make it competitive.
__________________
Adam Strang 1018 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|