|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Just trying not to beat the dead horse again.....
Speeding up the indexes would do what....make you feel better?.....Or just raise the speeds another 5 mph...and then everyone would complain how the speeds are out of hand and a limit needs to be put in place.....lol...not sure what your goal is with speeding up the indexes.....I just don't see it....we voted on it last year and it was voted down.... We have pretty good motors in our cars....and the dragster runs 186 at 890 and our car runs 168 at 990....how fast would they go at 8.00 and 9.00....don't even start with talking about increasing the spectator appeal...or participation....people just don't care about anything but fuel cars.....they hardly watch pro stock....and you're worried about not understanding the throttle stop racing..... Chris...look what you started....lol |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
In 1985 when I started, a dragster that went 8.60-8.70 was a pretty quick car. At any bracket race you were either the fastest or close to it. Today an 8.70 dragster at a bracket race is not only the slowest dragster there it is also slower than 1/2 the door cars. I agree that you will not get spectators even at a 6.90 index (now we're talking ![]() A new 7.90 class will NEVER happen as the track operators want less payout not more. It would just be less S/C cars. The result of the vote taken was that the majority of the S/C racers wanted the index lowered. They just did not agree on what to lower it to. The way that vote was presented, the outcome was determined before the vote was taken with 3 options. So how long do we keep 8.90 ??? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Why change it????
Because a stocker or super stocker can go that fast has nothing to do with Super Comp.... My vette is much more violent than my mustang but much slower in ET...so what.....is this an ego thing...(that wasn't a shot at you) but it just drives the cost and speed up....and its still the same...just quicker... we have bigger issues like seat belts and window nets and the cost to go to the races in general.... Race in TD if you want to go fast....that's why it was brought on.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fayetteville Ohio
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Rock,
Not trying to switch topic but, but how is it that S/St pays the same entry fee and the payout is $200. less than S/G & S/C ? Does the "entry level" apply here ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I like the way you think Bob, an entry level entry fee!! Works for me. 20 percent off!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 351
Likes: 62
Liked 126 Times in 61 Posts
|
![]()
Make all the Pro trees .500. That will allow a heavy car to run in SG
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
How about only Red cars in S/ST and S/G just saying.....
__________________
Old Mustang 2012 US Nationals Super Gas Champion 3461 S/ST & S/G |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
And don't forget, there's also Comp Eliminator too if you want to go fast in your dragster OR door car....
__________________
Jason Oldfield S/G & S/St 1838 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Morton, IL
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I see both sides of this. But would like to add the following comments.
1. Going faster WILL NOT bring in more spectators. The tracks need to do this. Most of the tracks we race at do a very poor job of marketing our events. Look at Norwalk, they do a great job and they get spectators. I don't think we will EVER pack the stands, but we could have a few more with some help from the tracks. But to be clear, changing the class will not help. 2. I do see where people are coming from about the indexes being 25+ years old. All the other classes have adjusted several times since inception. I would not be opposed to making the classes faster and I think round numbers would be a great idea. 3. Ultimately I will race the classes regardless of what they do. I am there for me, not for the fans.
__________________
Ryan Koener S/G 310C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with all three points. On #1, I'll agree that it won't bring in more spectators, but it will confuse/annoy the one's who are there substantially less. It's annoying for racers and fans to be on the stop for 1/3rd of the run. If it was just a second or so, I think we'd all like it more.
__________________
Chris Williams 6304 SC, TD, ET |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|