|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
Sounds like this is a bad combo for winning class,winning heads ups,and setting records.
(Welcome to my world) Aside from that,isn't it possible to build one to run the index at the current horsepower rating? As we are always reminded on Classracer....its just a bracket race.(Providing you can run the index) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 762
Likes: 16
Liked 653 Times in 89 Posts
|
![]()
Just play the HP game it's not that hard if you can read and follow rules. The 273ci mopar combo ran -.40 something under the index twice at one national event. These were the only two runs for this half of the season.
According to the NHRA posted HP reduction rules it received a 1.25% hp reduction. End of story just like my 281ci SS combo in the first half. Did the 1955 265ci combo run index? The combo MUST at least run the index to be eligible for a HP reduction. If any car makes one run over -.85 under the index that combo is ineligible for a HP reduction.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-20-2011 at 03:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 425
Likes: 1
Liked 52 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Doug , I ran 13.80`s with this combo in 1971 . Set the National Record at 13.90 .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Charley, it is -.85 under for one run and two runs of .65 under you go to the average`s. Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 97
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Here is the class page from the red book with the date 1975
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,838
Likes: 2,931
Liked 5,148 Times in 1,965 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So, they really don't need any new cars out there? How about when they have the Stockers factored at the Super /Stock number?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 12-20-2011 at 02:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 762
Likes: 16
Liked 653 Times in 89 Posts
|
![]()
Mark define new cars.
NHRA is happy as long as they have 32-65 cars per class at national events (AKA Filler for pro’s). This past year NHRA lower the year from 1960 to 1955 in stk. How many cars from 1955-1959 ran STK this year? One maybe two, good rule change it’s really helping raise the car counts and save STK. I have nothing against these older cars. I think they are cool but facts are facts no one is going to spend $30,000 plus build a 1955 chevy for P/SA, Q/SA or R/SA
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-20-2011 at 03:32 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tacoma,WA
Posts: 341
Likes: 2
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|